Hi Kern,
Perhaps it didn't drop the database but it did drop each table -- otherwise,
how can the example from the Catalog Maintenance chapter of the manual work?
mysqldump -f --opt bacula bacula.sql
mysql bacula bacula.sql
rm -f bacula.sql
because of the --opt parameter in the
Hi,
Jonas Björklund wrote:
Hello,
On Fri, 2 Sep 2005, Philipp Steinkrueger wrote:
if i want to backup a server running a mysql-db and i just backup
all the mysql-db-files, do i risk to save a corrupted version? i read
in the manual about the VSS problematic and save state in RDBMS
Hi,
if i want to backup a server running a mysql-db and i just backup
all the mysql-db-files, do i risk to save a corrupted version? i read
in the manual about the VSS problematic and save state in RDBMS
on windows, but in my case, the mysql db runs on linux.
i dont want to dump the mysql-dbs
Dan Langille wrote:
On 2 Sep 2005 at 14:16, Philipp Steinkrueger wrote:
Dan Langille wrote:
On 2 Sep 2005 at 12:39, Philipp Steinkrueger wrote:
if i want to backup a server running a mysql-db and i just backup
all the mysql-db-files, do i risk to save a corrupted version
Dan Langille wrote:
On 2 Sep 2005 at 12:39, Philipp Steinkrueger wrote:
if i want to backup a server running a mysql-db and i just backup
all the mysql-db-files, do i risk to save a corrupted version? i read
in the manual about the VSS problematic and save state in RDBMS
on windows
Hi Kern,
Kern Sibbald wrote:
Could you tell me where?
It is a rather obvious concept, but I haven't seen anything really quite the
same. I'd be interested to see what similar projects are doing.
i thought of redhat for example, although this is something different,
as they keep one
Hi Kern,
you can see this development at several places throughout the OpenSource
scene. actually i cant see any difference between this licence concept which
asks you to buy a licence if you want to make profit with the software and
classical commercial software which also allows private users
Hi,
bacula aborted a job, because the client could not
connect to the storage daemon. heres what the status
mail sais:
Fatal error: Failed to connect to Storage daemon: myhost.mydomain.tld:9103
SD termination status: Waiting on FD
Termination:*** Backup Error ***
a status
Hi Phil,
I'm not sure I see what you're after here. In general, it would be a
bad idea -- and increase the amount of data to back up -- to make a
differential against anything BUT the latest full backup. I utterly
fail to see how intentionally running a differential against an older
Full
Phil Stracchino wrote:
Philipp Steinkrueger wrote:
Okay, i'll try to explain my idea again:
I have two primary goals:
G1: Protect data against burn down of the autochanger location
G2: Be able to restore any data anytime without inserting tapes into the
autochanger
I dont think
Phil Stracchino wrote:
Philipp Steinkrueger wrote:
Phil Stracchino wrote:
Well, there are future features coming that will make much of this
easier, including the copy job (duplicate media), and the migration job
(migrate a job from disk to tape). These would allow you to:
1. Make
Hi all,
as my post about backup strategy and concepts from the 5th
is still unanswered, i am trying to break down my, i have to
admit, long question.
i think all i need to do what i want is a possibility to tell
bacula to do differential backups against a specific full
backup and not against
Hi,
i am getting this error message when i try to label my
tapes. i am using barcodes, so i executed:
label barcodes slots=18,19
and this happens:
Sending label command for Volume OOIS02L1 Slot 18 ...
3301 Issuing autochanger loaded drive 0 command.
3302 Autochanger loaded drive 0, result:
13 matches
Mail list logo
