Re: [Bacula-users] bacula performance
I always check manager/perfmonance, and when it is in the middle of bacula job, I noticed bacula-fd.exe process is missing from windows Resource Monitor > Network and Disk , and bacual-fd.exe cpu usgae 0 but Memory usage 49,744 K . any thought? On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 1:57 PM Dimitri Maziuk via Bacula-users < bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote: > On 6/3/19 2:06 PM, ce wrote: > > > running multiple jobs for the same client at the same time makes it > > worse...!!! > > I use neither encryption nor windows, but this hints at disk i/o. I'm > sure sysinternals have some iostat equivalent, or you maybe you could > try watching it in task manager/perfmon? > > -- > Dimitri Maziuk > Programmer/sysadmin > BioMagResBank, UW-Madison -- http://www.bmrb.wisc.edu > > ___ > Bacula-users mailing list > Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users > ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
[Bacula-users] bacula performance
Does any one else have issue with bacula speed with bacula 9.4.2. is that normal that bacula speed is too low when encryption is enabled for windows client and Windows Network IO is around xx kb/s or less with 1 Gbps bandwidth ??? No cpu and memory issue on the client/server sides though. P.S. running multiple jobs for the same client at the same time makes it worse...!!! ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] Multiple bacula jobs at the same time
thank you Dimitri for your response.
the network has the bandwidth, but not sure why the bacula job is so slow
after changing Encryption algorithm.
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth Retr
[ 4] 0.00-10.00 sec 991 MBytes 832 Mbits/sec 1245
sender
for an Incremental backup as follows you can see how slow it is:
Elapsed timeLevelBytesFilesSpeed
14:57:35 Incremental 9.22 MB 67 179.49 B/s 0.38 IncrementalPool
I had encryption enabled before on older version of bacula on older server
which also showed similar Speed but did not take too long for such a small
change.
but with a new version of bacual and with different encryption it is so
slow.
I am not sure which part is really causing this issue, any idea? do I need
to assign more resource (CPU/RAM) to bacula server/client server? or any
changes to the disk type?
although I do not see any high usage of CPU or RAM when it is running the
slow jobs either on the client or the server, can this be related to the
encryption process? where does the encryption happen? what can I do to
speed it up?
On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 11:34 AM Dimitri Maziuk via Bacula-users <
bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote:
> On 5/16/19 12:06 PM, ce wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > How can I setup bacula to run multiple bacula jobs at the same time for
> the
> > same windows client?
> > should I just set Maximum Concurrent Jobs to more than one, can I set 3
> or
> > 4 concurrent bacula jobs for a windows client? is that possible?
>
> Setting that in the Job definition should work. My "server"-side setup is
>
> >
> > enable concurrency in 4 places:
> > - Storage stanza in bacula-sd.conf
> > - Device stanza in bacula-sd.conf
> > - Storage stanza in bacula-dir.conf
> > - Director stanza in bacula-dir.conf
> >
> > Specifically, "Storage" is in both config files.
>
> and for some clients I have 2 jobs run in parallel ("configs" and "data
> dirs").
>
> However if you want to run 4 long jobs in parallel, I'd first make sure
> the network has the bandwidth for it.
>
> --
> Dimitri Maziuk
> Programmer/sysadmin
> BioMagResBank, UW-Madison -- http://www.bmrb.wisc.edu
>
> ___
> Bacula-users mailing list
> Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
>
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
[Bacula-users] Multiple bacula jobs at the same time
Hi, How can I setup bacula to run multiple bacula jobs at the same time for the same windows client? should I just set Maximum Concurrent Jobs to more than one, can I set 3 or 4 concurrent bacula jobs for a windows client? is that possible? I have different storage for the backup of each folder so they do not share the same location for backup volumes storage. thanks for your help in advance. ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
[Bacula-users] multiple bacula jobs at the same time
ce has sent you an email via Gmail confidential mode:multiple bacula jobs at the same timeThis message was sent on May 16, 2019 at 9:13:03 AM PDTYou can open it by clicking the link below. This link will only work for bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net.View the emailGmail confidential mode gives you more control over the messages you send. Set an expiration time, disable printing or forwarding of a message and more. Learn moreGmail: Email by GoogleUse is subject to the Google Privacy PolicyGoogle LLC, 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, CA 94043, USAYou have received this message because someone sent you an email via Gmail confidential mode. ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] question about bacula job speed
for the bacula backups on the old bacula server ( for backups of a windows client ), I never noticed that long bacula jobs for incremental and differential ones. on the new bacula server for the backups of one of the folder: Elapsed timeLevelBytesFilesSpeed 13:45:29 Differential 2.17 MB 42 45.92 B/s 0.35 on the new bacula server for the backups of another folder on the same client: Elapsed timeLevelBytesFilesSpeed 03:00:03 Differential 932.23 MB 1.648 88.36 KB/s how can I find out why there is such a difference? the second folder backup has even more files for backup as you see above but it took less. NOTE: for the first folder: 22 G out of 500 G free space for the second folder 400 G out of 700 free space? not sure if having more free space for the client folders, will affect the speed of backup? any help will be appreciated! On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 12:58 PM Christian Lehmann wrote: > Hi and welcome! > > > > Most of the time, the limiting factor for an incremental backup is the > analysis of all files by the file daemon on the client. > > So, only some small changes/files need to be backed-up, but bacula can > only know this by analyse one file after another. > > So it can well be that an incremental backup can need as much time as a > full backup, presumed, the transfer rate for your backup device and/or to > your server is not the limiting factor. > > > > However, which the information you provided, it is difficult to give you a > black “Yes or No”-answer. > > > > Best, > > > > Christian > > > > *Von:* ce > *Gesendet:* Montag, 13. Mai 2019 20:30 > *An:* bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net > *Betreff:* [Bacula-users] question about bacula job speed > > > > Hi everyone, > > Is that normal that incremental bacula job ( just to backup a few > megabytes) takes 9 or 10 hours? assuming there is no performance or any > issue on the servers and clients, only encryption algorithm has changed > recently! > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
[Bacula-users] question about bacula job speed
Hi everyone, Is that normal that incremental bacula job ( just to backup a few megabytes) takes 9 or 10 hours? assuming there is no performance or any issue on the servers and clients, only encryption algorithm has changed recently! Thanks, ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
