Re: [Bacula-users] [9.0.0] Disabled Jobs don't show in log, "run"-Command nor in Job table

2017-07-21 Thread Uwe Schuerkamp
On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 05:39:56PM +0200, Kern Sibbald wrote: > This is a feature that was requested by users. > > Jobs that are disabled are no longer listed in the list of jobs available to > be run. If you manually run a disabled job, it will still run. > > Best regards, > > Kern > >

Re: [Bacula-users] [9.0.0] Disabled Jobs don't show in log, "run"-Command nor in Job table

2017-07-20 Thread Kern Sibbald
This is a feature that was requested by users. Jobs that are disabled are no longer listed in the list of jobs available to be run. If you manually run a disabled job, it will still run. Best regards, Kern On 07/20/2017 03:40 PM, Uwe Schuerkamp wrote: Hi folks, I have a few jobs that I

[Bacula-users] [9.0.0] Disabled Jobs don't show in log, "run"-Command nor in Job table

2017-07-20 Thread Uwe Schuerkamp
Hi folks, I have a few jobs that I run manually from time to time and so I've set them to "Enabled = False" in their job definition. It seems that as of 9.0.0, running these jobs no longer shows up in bacula's log nor in the Job table. Also, they're not listed in the job list anymore when I