Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 9.0.3 on Debian 9.1 with OpenSSL-1.0.2l doubts

2017-08-29 Thread Kern Sibbald
Hmm. If I apply your patch for SQLite3, it does not make much sense to disable configuring SQLite3. I am going to rethink that decision. On 08/29/2017 05:52 PM, Kern Sibbald wrote: Hello Carsten, Oh, sorry, I thought you had submitted Debian bug reports, but they were Bacula bug reports. On

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 9.0.3 on Debian 9.1 with OpenSSL-1.0.2l doubts

2017-08-29 Thread Kern Sibbald
Hello Carsten, Oh, sorry, I thought you had submitted Debian bug reports, but they were Bacula bug reports. On a quick look, this will correct the SQLite3 update script. For the update_mysql_tables.in, I will need to take a closer look. Best regards, Kern On 08/29/2017 05:08 PM, Carsten Leonha

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 9.0.3 on Debian 9.1 with OpenSSL-1.0.2l doubts

2017-08-29 Thread Carsten Leonhardt
Hi Kern, Kern Sibbald writes: > I have not seen the attachments you refer to. If you either send them > to me or supply me with a link to them, I will look at them, but I > promise nothing since the goal for the last few years has been to stop > spending time on SQLite. They are at: http://bu

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 9.0.3 on Debian 9.1 with OpenSSL-1.0.2l doubts

2017-08-29 Thread Kern Sibbald
Hello Carsten, Please see below ... On 08/29/2017 02:19 AM, Carsten Leonhardt wrote: Hi Kern, Kern Sibbald writes: It has been a long time since the Bacula Community version supports SQLite3. The code is still there, but it simply does not perform well, and so it is not at all suitable fo

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 9.0.3 on Debian 9.1 with OpenSSL-1.0.2l doubts

2017-08-28 Thread Carsten Leonhardt
Hi Kern, Kern Sibbald writes: > It has been a long time since the Bacula Community version supports > SQLite3. The code is still there, but it simply does not perform > well, and so it is not at all suitable for a Bacula production > environment. The only two officially supported databases are

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 9.0.3 on Debian 9.1 with OpenSSL-1.0.2l doubts

2017-08-28 Thread Kern Sibbald
Thanks. I will fix that right away. Best regards, Kern On 08/27/2017 07:22 PM, Davide Franco wrote: Hello, Just for your information, the main manual for version 9.0.3 still mention SQLite.

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 9.0.3 on Debian 9.1 with OpenSSL-1.0.2l doubts

2017-08-28 Thread Kern Sibbald
Hello Carsten, It has been a long time since the Bacula Community version supports SQLite3. The code is still there, but it simply does not perform well, and so it is not at all suitable for a Bacula production environment. The only two officially supported databases are MySQL and PostgreSQL

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 9.0.3 on Debian 9.1 with OpenSSL-1.0.2l doubts

2017-08-27 Thread Carsten Leonhardt
Heitor Faria writes: > Hello, Carsten, > >> Before I can release Bacula 9.0.3 to Debian unstable, bugs 2305 and 2306 >> about sqlite3 database creation/update need to be addressed. > > SQLite isn't supported anymore by the Bacula developers. > This was widely advertised in previous threads and ch

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 9.0.3 on Debian 9.1 with OpenSSL-1.0.2l doubts

2017-08-27 Thread Davide Franco
Hello, Just for your information, the main manual for version 9.0.3 still mention SQLite. http://www.bacula.org/9.0.x-manuals/en/main/System_Requirements.html Best regards Davide On Sun, 27 Aug 2017 at 15:14, Sven Hartge wrote: > On 27.08.2017 14:42, Heitor Faria wrote: > > Hello, Carsten,

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 9.0.3 on Debian 9.1 with OpenSSL-1.0.2l doubts

2017-08-27 Thread Sven Hartge
On 27.08.2017 14:42, Heitor Faria wrote: > Hello, Carsten, > So, is it possible install Bacula 9.0.3 in Debian 9.1 or similar SO with newers OpenSSL versions using this way, or this is not possible? >>> >>> I just checked and the current in-development version of the >>> Debian-official

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 9.0.3 on Debian 9.1 with OpenSSL-1.0.2l doubts

2017-08-27 Thread Heitor Faria
Hello, Carsten, >>> So, is it possible install Bacula 9.0.3 in Debian 9.1 or similar SO with >>> newers OpenSSL versions using this way, or this is not possible? >> >> I just checked and the current in-development version of the >> Debian-official packages of 9.0.3 compile in a Jessie-Backports ch

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 9.0.3 on Debian 9.1 with OpenSSL-1.0.2l doubts

2017-08-27 Thread Carsten Leonhardt
Sven Hartge writes: > On 23.08.2017 18:20, Wanderlei Huttel wrote: > >> So, is it possible install Bacula 9.0.3 in Debian 9.1 or similar SO with >> newers OpenSSL versions using this way, or this is not possible? > > I just checked and the current in-development version of the > Debian-official p

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 9.0.3 on Debian 9.1 with OpenSSL-1.0.2l doubts

2017-08-23 Thread Wanderlei Huttel
Hello Sven I guess I don't have the enough knowledge to do what you suggested. But is it possible to compile Bacula as "the usual way" ? Do you have some document with steps to do this? Best regards *Wanderlei Hüttel* http://www.huttel.com.br 2017-08-23 13:45 GMT-03:00 Sven Hartge : > On 23.

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 9.0.3 on Debian 9.1 with OpenSSL-1.0.2l doubts

2017-08-23 Thread Sven Hartge
On 23.08.2017 18:20, Wanderlei Huttel wrote: > So, is it possible install Bacula 9.0.3 in Debian 9.1 or similar SO with > newers OpenSSL versions using this way, or this is not possible? I just checked and the current in-development version of the Debian-official packages of 9.0.3 compile in a Je

[Bacula-users] Bacula 9.0.3 on Debian 9.1 with OpenSSL-1.0.2l doubts

2017-08-23 Thread Wanderlei Huttel
Hello I was trying to compile Bacula 9.0.3 with OpenSSL-1.0.2l I following some tips from a friend in Brazil (Molinux) to install OpenSSL-1.0.2l in another directory. --- # Compile OpenSSL 1.0.2L version cd /usr/src/