Re: [Bacula-users] Bad response to Append Data command.

2007-12-12 Thread marc . smith
On Wed, 5 Dec 2007, Martin Simmons wrote: If that is OK, then I suggest running the SD with debug level 200, which might give us a clue where the error occurs. So far I have been unable to get it to fail using -d200, while it does fail if I don't specify a debug level. Maybe there is a

Re: [Bacula-users] Bad response to Append Data command.

2007-12-08 Thread Steve Thompson
On Wed, 5 Dec 2007, Martin Simmons wrote: If that is OK, then I suggest running the SD with debug level 200, which might give us a clue where the error occurs. So far I have been unable to get it to fail using -d200, while it does fail if I don't specify a debug level. Maybe there is a

Re: [Bacula-users] Bad response to Append Data command.

2007-12-08 Thread marc . smith
On Wed, 5 Dec 2007, Martin Simmons wrote: If that is OK, then I suggest running the SD with debug level 200, which might give us a clue where the error occurs. So far I have been unable to get it to fail using -d200, while it does fail if I don't specify a debug level. Maybe there is a

Re: [Bacula-users] Bad response to Append Data command.

2007-12-05 Thread Martin Simmons
On Wed, 5 Dec 2007 11:36:33 -0500 (EST), Steve Thompson said: On Wed, 5 Dec 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am still experiencing this problem on a regular basis; not every job does this, but it seems a good 40% do each night. [...] 05-Dec 03:33 escabot-fd JobId 8219: Fatal error:

Re: [Bacula-users] Bad response to Append Data command.

2007-12-05 Thread Martin Simmons
On Wed, 5 Dec 2007 13:46:26 -0500 (EST), Steve Thompson said: On Wed, 5 Dec 2007, Dan Langille wrote: My first idea: different versions of SD and FD, with one trying to use a command the other does not recognize. What version is each of: bacula-dir, bacula-fd, bacula-sd They are

Re: [Bacula-users] Bad response to Append Data command.

2007-12-05 Thread marc . smith
On Wed, 5 Dec 2007, Steve Thompson wrote: On Wed, 5 Dec 2007, Martin Simmons wrote: On Wed, 5 Dec 2007 11:36:33 -0500 (EST), Steve Thompson said: I see this very often as well, and I am using disk exclusively. It also happens about 40% of the time, and has done since I started with bacula at

Re: [Bacula-users] Bad response to Append Data command.

2007-12-05 Thread Dan Langille
On Wed, 5 Dec 2007, Steve Thompson wrote: On Wed, 5 Dec 2007, Martin Simmons wrote: On Wed, 5 Dec 2007 11:36:33 -0500 (EST), Steve Thompson said: I see this very often as well, and I am using disk exclusively. It also happens about 40% of the time, and has done since I started with bacula at

Re: [Bacula-users] Bad response to Append Data command.

2007-12-05 Thread Steve Thompson
On Wed, 5 Dec 2007, Martin Simmons wrote: On Wed, 5 Dec 2007 13:46:26 -0500 (EST), Steve Thompson said: They are all the same at 2.2.4. It happens even in the case where bacula-dir, bacula-fd and bacula-sd are running on the same machine. Everything was rebuilt from source by myself, and

Re: [Bacula-users] Bad response to Append Data command.

2007-12-05 Thread Steve Thompson
On Wed, 5 Dec 2007, Dan Langille wrote: My first idea: different versions of SD and FD, with one trying to use a command the other does not recognize. What version is each of: bacula-dir, bacula-fd, bacula-sd They are all the same at 2.2.4. It happens even in the case where bacula-dir,

Re: [Bacula-users] Bad response to Append Data command.

2007-12-05 Thread Steve Thompson
On Wed, 5 Dec 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am still experiencing this problem on a regular basis; not every job does this, but it seems a good 40% do each night. [...] 05-Dec 03:33 escabot-fd JobId 8219: Fatal error: job.c:1811 Bad response to Append Data command. Wanted 3000 OK data I

Re: [Bacula-users] Bad response to Append Data command.

2007-12-05 Thread marc . smith
On Wed, 5 Dec 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am still experiencing this problem on a regular basis; not every job does this, but it seems a good 40% do each night. [...] 05-Dec 03:33 escabot-fd JobId 8219: Fatal error: job.c:1811 Bad response to Append Data command. Wanted 3000 OK data

Re: [Bacula-users] Bad response to Append Data command.

2007-12-05 Thread marc . smith
I am still experiencing this problem on a regular basis; not every job does this, but it seems a good 40% do each night. I cleaned both of my tape drives last night, but I still get the fatal errors. Here is another example: 05-Dec 03:32 escabot-dir JobId 8219: BeforeJob: run command

[Bacula-users] Bad response to Append Data command.

2007-11-28 Thread marc . smith
Hi, I am using Bacula 2.2.6 with a Spectra Logic T50 tape library (with 2 LTO3 drives). I have about 20 jobs that are run nightly, allowing Bacula to run multiple jobs at once (one on each drive). Here are my configuration files log: http://esweb.mcc.edu/~marc.smith/bacula/ This seems to

Re: [Bacula-users] Bad response to Append Data command. Wanted 3000 OK data, , got 3903 Error append data

2006-11-10 Thread Kern Sibbald
Hello, Note for Arno: 1.39.26+ does a better job of helping one diagnose these problems by printing the full output from mtx when a failure occurs. On Friday 10 November 2006 00:46, Arno Lehmann wrote: Hi, On 11/9/2006 7:25 AM, Ryan Novosielski wrote: I've gotten this one... I'd love to

Re: [Bacula-users] Bad response to Append Data command. Wanted 3000 OK data, , got 3903 Error append data

2006-11-09 Thread Arno Lehmann
Hi, On 11/9/2006 7:25 AM, Ryan Novosielski wrote: I've gotten this one... I'd love to know what it is too. :) Dat's an error ;-) Jake Goerzen wrote: What does it mean when this happens? and is there a way to fix it? 07-Nov 08:40 adam-dir: Start Backup JobId 369,

[Bacula-users] Bad response to Append Data command. Wanted 3000 OK data, , got 3903 Error append data

2006-11-08 Thread Jake Goerzen
What does it mean when this happens? 07-Nov 08:40 adam-dir: Start Backup JobId 369, Job=BackupACSRV.2006-11-07_08.40.54 07-Nov 08:40 adam-sd: 3301 Issuing autochanger loaded drive 0 command. 07-Nov 08:41 adam-sd: 3991 Bad autochanger loaded drive 0 command: ERR=Child exited with code 1. 07-Nov

[Bacula-users] Bad response to Append Data command. Wanted 3000 OK data, , got 3903 Error append data

2006-11-08 Thread Jake Goerzen
What does it mean when this happens? and is there a way to fix it? 07-Nov 08:40 adam-dir: Start Backup JobId 369, Job=BackupACSRV.2006-11-07_08.40.54 07-Nov 08:40 adam-sd: 3301 Issuing autochanger loaded drive 0 command. 07-Nov 08:41 adam-sd: 3991 Bad autochanger loaded drive 0 command:

Re: [Bacula-users] Bad response to Append Data command. Wanted 3000 OK data, , got 3903 Error append data

2006-11-08 Thread Ryan Novosielski
I've gotten this one... I'd love to know what it is too. :) Jake Goerzen wrote: What does it mean when this happens? and is there a way to fix it? 07-Nov 08:40 adam-dir: Start Backup JobId 369, Job=BackupACSRV.2006-11-07_08.40.54 07-Nov 08:40 adam-sd: 3301 Issuing autochanger loaded

[Bacula-users] Bad response to Append Data command

2006-10-10 Thread Robert Keidel
Hello, I try to get bacula running on a Centos 4 running. I have VXA2 autochanger. I went through the manuals, and everything seems to work fine. I started backup job and it looked very good. After the test run, I changed my bacula-dir.conf to add another client and change what has to be

[Bacula-users] Bad response to Append Data command

2006-10-09 Thread Robert Keidel
Hello, I try to get bacula running on a Centos 4 running. I have VXA2 autochanger. I went through the manuals, and everything seems to work fine. I started backup job and it looked very good. After the test run, I changed my bacula-dir.conf to add another client and change what has to be backed

Re: [Bacula-users] Bad response to Append Data command

2006-10-09 Thread Michael Brennen
On Monday 09 October 2006 13:53, Robert Keidel wrote: I try to get bacula running on a Centos 4 running. I have VXA2 autochanger. I went through the manuals, and everything seems to work fine. I started backup job and it looked very good. After the test run, I changed my bacula-dir.conf to

Re: [Bacula-users] Bad response to Append Data command

2006-10-09 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Monday 09 October 2006 20:53, Robert Keidel wrote: Hello, I try to get bacula running on a Centos 4 running. I have VXA2 autochanger. I went through the manuals, and everything seems to work fine. I started backup job and it looked very good. After the test run, I changed my

[Bacula-users] Bad response to Append Data command.

2006-10-03 Thread Keith Phipps
I seem to be past the Appendable media issue I've been having - now I'm getting something totally different when I try and run this backup: You have messages. * * * *messages 02-Oct 13:59 bacula-atl2-sd: 3302 Autochanger loaded drive 0, result is Slot 8. 02-Oct 13:59 bacula-atl2-sd:

Re: [Bacula-users] Bad response to Append Data command

2006-09-06 Thread Alan Brown
On Tue, 5 Sep 2006, Arno Lehmann wrote: I get several messages like these on dmesg: (scsi2:A:15:0): data overrun detected in Data-in phase. Tag == 0x3. (scsi2:A:15:0): Have seen Data Phase. Length = 50. NumSGs = 1. sg[0] - Addr 0x11c3b8000 : Length 50 These are SCSI errors and it's

Re: [Bacula-users] Bad response to Append Data command

2006-09-06 Thread Jaime Ventura
Thank you Alan and Arno, for your help. Although I made a kernel update, i checked the the data cable. Is was slightly disconnected. Probably that was the problem. Now those dmesg messages are gone. Now I have a tape with volStatus =Error. What now? What you recommend? delete the jobs associated

Re: [Bacula-users] Bad response to Append Data command

2006-09-06 Thread Alan Brown
On Wed, 6 Sep 2006, Jaime Ventura wrote: Although I made a kernel update, i checked the the data cable. Is was slightly disconnected. Probably that was the problem. very likely. Now I have a tape with volStatus =Error. What now? What you recommend? delete the jobs associated with that tape

[Bacula-users] Bad response to Append Data command

2006-09-05 Thread Jaime Ventura
Hello, Im backing up data to tape using a tapeloader, and im experiencing the following problem: 05-Sep 09:38 isep-dir: Start Backup JobId 498, Job=jtgv-gsi.2006-09-05_09.38.17 05-Sep 09:38 localhost-sd: 3301 Issuing autochanger loaded drive 0 command. 05-Sep 09:38 localhost-sd: 3302

Re: [Bacula-users] Bad response to Append Data command

2006-09-05 Thread Arno Lehmann
Hello, On 9/5/2006 10:44 AM, Jaime Ventura wrote: Hello, Im backing up data to tape using a tapeloader, and im experiencing the following problem: 05-Sep 09:38 isep-dir: Start Backup JobId 498, Job=jtgv-gsi.2006-09-05_09.38.17 05-Sep 09:38 localhost-sd: 3301 Issuing autochanger

Re: [Bacula-users] Bad response to Append Data command

2006-09-05 Thread Jaime Ventura
Arno Lehmann, Thanks for you reply. Im using RHEL 4 x86_64 with a dell powervault 124T. Im using bacula for some time backing up to disk. Now i bought a a dell powervault 124T so i can make backups to tape. So, im newbe to tape issues. Im on a test environment... making

Re: [Bacula-users] Bad response to Append Data command

2006-09-05 Thread Jaime Ventura
: [Bacula-users] Bad response to Append Data command Arno Lehmann, Thanks for you reply. Im using RHEL 4 x86_64 with a dell powervault 124T. Im using bacula for some time backing up to disk. Now i bought a a dell powervault 124T so i can make backups to tape. So, im newbe to tape

Re: [Bacula-users] Bad response to Append Data command

2006-09-05 Thread Uwe Schuerkamp
] Bad response to Append Data command Thanks for your reply. I've already installer and heavily tested the tapeloader with bacula. I've done lots of backups to tape. All worked ok. Then I went on vacation, and when I came I was getting this error. I cant figure out what happened

Re: [Bacula-users] Bad response to Append Data command

2006-09-05 Thread Jaime Ventura
, 05 Sep 2006 12:59:57 +0100 Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Bad response to Append Data command Thanks for your reply. I've already installer and heavily tested the tapeloader with bacula. I've done lots of backups to tape. All worked ok. Then I went on vacation, and when I came I

Re: [Bacula-users] Bad response to Append Data command

2006-09-05 Thread Arno Lehmann
: From: Jaime Ventura [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Uwe Schuerkamp [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Arno Lehmann [EMAIL PROTECTED], Bacula Users bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2006 12:59:57 +0100 Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Bad response to Append Data command Thanks for your reply. I've

Re: [Bacula-users] Bad response to Append Data command.

2005-11-04 Thread Christoph Haas
Kern, thanks for your quick reply. On Thursday 03 November 2005 19:33, Kern Sibbald wrote: It looks like you stumbled into a change they made in the 2.6 kernel, which will undoubtely cause a lot of people a *lot* of pain. The change prohibits a program from opening a drive in read/write mode

Re: [Bacula-users] Bad response to Append Data command.

2005-11-04 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Friday 04 November 2005 09:15, Christoph Haas wrote: Kern, thanks for your quick reply. On Thursday 03 November 2005 19:33, Kern Sibbald wrote: It looks like you stumbled into a change they made in the 2.6 kernel, which will undoubtely cause a lot of people a *lot* of pain. The change

Re: [Bacula-users] Bad response to Append Data command.

2005-11-03 Thread Kern Sibbald
Hello, It looks like you stumbled into a change they made in the 2.6 kernel, which will undoubtely cause a lot of people a *lot* of pain. The change prohibits a program from opening a drive in read/write mode if there is no volume in the drive. If this is what is causing your problem, you

[Bacula-users] Bad Response to Append Data Command

2005-08-23 Thread Aaron Summers
This error is appearing more and more. Sometimes the backups run, sometimes I get the following error: We are obviously writing data to a file, other backups are running on the machine. I am perplexed since sometimes it works, other times it fails. 23-Aug 20:36 vortech-dir: Start Backup JobId