Hello,
czw., 1 paź 2020 o 16:45 napisał(a):
> > Yes, it is true to some extent.
>
> Hm, I believe it happens in all cases.
> In what case it wouldn't be true?
>
AFAIK, Bacula can generate messages which won't be combined in the mail
buffer file used to send emails.
There few differences which
On 2020-10-01 13:41, Martin Simmons wrote:
I think Josip wants a single email that combines the logs from the job
that
reads the old volume (the Copy job) and the job that writes to the new
volume
(the new Backup job).
This would be like the single email that you get for a normal backup
On 2020-10-01 10:47, Radosław Korzeniewski wrote:
Hello,
I have an impression that you and I are talking about two totally
distinctive things, so to progress with our discussion all things
have to be cleared out.
It looks like it but not completely.
I hope it will be more clear after my
> On Thu, 1 Oct 2020 10:47:12 +0200, Radosław Korzeniewski said:
>
> Hello,
>
> I have an impression that you and I are talking about two totally
> distinctive things, so to progress with our discussion all things have to
> be cleared out.
>
> śr., 30 wrz 2020 o 14:04 napisał(a):
>
> > >>
Hello,
I have an impression that you and I are talking about two totally
distinctive things, so to progress with our discussion all things have to
be cleared out.
śr., 30 wrz 2020 o 14:04 napisał(a):
> >> And indeed, messages in the second e-mail which correspond to the
> >> original Job seems
On 2020-09-30 12:32, Radosław Korzeniewski wrote:
Hello,
Radosław, I apologize, it seems that I have sent the message to you
directly instead of sending it to the mailing list.
It happens sometimes when I use my webmail and forget that I need
to send the response to the mailing list.
śr.,
Hello,
śr., 30 wrz 2020 o 12:01 napisał(a):
> > No, SD does not handle this kind of messages. It is a Director
> > responsibility only.
>
> I don't think so.
> From what I understood, all Bacula daemons have their own message
> handlers but by default it is convenient for people to send
Hello,
Probably I do not help with this subject, but I want to clarify some infos:
pon., 28 wrz 2020 o 18:53 napisał(a):
>
> I naively tried to use a separate Messages resource with the Copy
> job but that didn't help and the results were the same, probably
> because the reports for the copied
Hello,
Copy job is a bit special in a way that it starts and performs the copy
of selected jobs, depending on the "Selection Type" directive.
The problem is that when a job is copied, messages of the Copy
job and the messages related to the job that is being copied are
not combined which
