Re: [Bacula-users] performance problems backing up ocfs2 clusters

Hi folks, thanks for your suggestions, I tried your tar suggestion and indeed it turns out that transfer rates drop to the dozens of kb/sec in one special directory stored on the ocfs2 filesystem. I'm now in contact with the ocfs2 devs on the users list to see if they have any suggestions. All

Re: [Bacula-users] performance problems backing up ocfs2 clusters

On Wed, 04 Mar 2009 11:24:22 +0100, Uwe Schuerkamp wrote: > Hello folks, > > we're experiencing massive problems backing up an ocfs2 cluster > filesystem mounted on SLES 10 SP2 machines located on a shared SAN > storage). The cluster has 8 members, and we've already tried certain > mount options

[Bacula-users] performance problems backing up ocfs2 clusters

Hello folks, we're experiencing massive problems backing up an ocfs2 cluster filesystem mounted on SLES 10 SP2 machines located on a shared SAN storage). The cluster has 8 members, and we've already tried certain mount options (noatime et al.) in an attempt to improve performance, however bacula's

Re: [Bacula-users] Performance problems in migration from disk to tape

On Fri, 2009-01-23 at 10:58 +0200, Ari Suutari wrote: > Hi, > > >This is know problem in bacula versions up to 2.4.4 > >It is fixed in recent beta 2.5.28-b1 > > This sounds great ! Are there any possibilities that > the fix might be seen in future 2.4 versions, or should Dont think so, there are

Re: [Bacula-users] Performance problems in migration from disk to tape

Hi, >This is know problem in bacula versions up to 2.4.4 >It is fixed in recent beta 2.5.28-b1 This sounds great ! Are there any possibilities that the fix might be seen in future 2.4 versions, or should I just upgrade to beta versions ? Using beta versions is tempting, because I would like to us

Re: [Bacula-users] Performance problems in migration from disk to tape

Hi, >What version of Bacula are you running? Which OS? What kind of hardware do >you have? :) Sorry, I forgot those: Bacula 2.4.4, FreeBSD 7.1, disks are SATA disks and tape is HP DAT160. Ari S. -- This SF.net ema

Re: [Bacula-users] Performance problems in migration from disk to tape

On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 10:05:53AM +0200, Ari Suutari wrote: > Hi, > > My configuration is roughly like this: I back up > about 10 hosts to disk volume using bacula and > migrate the backups to tape once a week. > > Backups work ok, the resulting volume file on > disk is currently about 25 Gb. I

Re: [Bacula-users] Performance problems in migration from disk to tape

On Fri, 2009-01-23 at 10:05 +0200, Ari Suutari wrote: > Hi, > > My configuration is roughly like this: I back up > about 10 hosts to disk volume using bacula and > migrate the backups to tape once a week. > > Backups work ok, the resulting volume file on > disk is currently about 25 Gb. I have al

[Bacula-users] Performance problems in migration from disk to tape

Hi, My configuration is roughly like this: I back up about 10 hosts to disk volume using bacula and migrate the backups to tape once a week. Backups work ok, the resulting volume file on disk is currently about 25 Gb. I have also some backups going directly to tape, performance there is also ok.

Re: [Bacula-users] Performance problems

John Drescher schrieb: > > > On 11/15/06, *Manuel Staechele* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > wrote: > > Hello, > > i want restore a simple file from a FULL job which is not that big. > and it took 10 hours to build the directory-tree. > > job informations: >

Re: [Bacula-users] Performance problems

On 11/15/06, Manuel Staechele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello,i want restore a simple file from a FULL job which is not that big.and it took 10 hours to build the directory-tree.job informations:Type | Level | JobFiles | JobBytes| JobStatus | B| F |  913,065 |  17,818,106,395 | T--

[Bacula-users] Performance problems

Hello, i want restore a simple file from a FULL job which is not that big. and it took 10 hours to build the directory-tree. job informations: Type | Level | JobFiles | JobBytes| JobStatus | B| F | 913,065 | 17,818,106,395 | T -- i have already checked if there are all rec