Re: [Bacula-users] Solaris Packet size too big failures

2009-01-27 Thread Allan Black
Jason Dixon wrote: a Packet size too big error. The Director resides on a global zone in Solaris x86. I've managed to capture a truss during one of the failures: http://mirrors.omniti.com/bacula/bacula.truss Very strange. Everything seems to be going normally: 14106/1:

Re: [Bacula-users] Solaris Packet size too big failures

2009-01-27 Thread Allan Black
Hi, Jason, Just found this on SunSolve: Solution Type Sun Alert Solution 201321 : Solaris 10 Systems With Certain Patches Installed May Experience Data Integrity Issues Over TCP Loopback 1. Impact Solaris 10 systems installed without patch 127111-03 or later

Re: [Bacula-users] Solaris Packet size too big failures

2009-01-27 Thread Jason Dixon
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 10:36:05AM +, Allan Black wrote: Hi, Jason, Just found this on SunSolve: Solution Type Sun Alert Solution 201321 : Solaris 10 Systems With Certain Patches Installed May Experience Data Integrity Issues Over TCP Loopback I

Re: [Bacula-users] Solaris Packet size too big failures

2009-01-27 Thread Jason Dixon
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 12:37:36PM -0500, Jason Dixon wrote: On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 10:36:05AM +, Allan Black wrote: Hi, Jason, Just found this on SunSolve: Solution Type Sun Alert Solution 201321 : Solaris 10 Systems With Certain Patches Installed May

Re: [Bacula-users] Solaris Packet size too big failures

2009-01-27 Thread Jason Dixon
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 10:12:03AM +, Allan Black wrote: Jason Dixon wrote: a Packet size too big error. The Director resides on a global zone in Solaris x86. I've managed to capture a truss during one of the failures: http://mirrors.omniti.com/bacula/bacula.truss ... [This is

[Bacula-users] Solaris Packet size too big failures

2009-01-26 Thread Jason Dixon
[ Creating a fresh thread... ] We moved our Bacula Director off Linux to Solaris (not my choice) recently. Since then, we've encountered frequent failures of the catalog backup job which reads from the local FD. They always fail with a Packet size too big error. The Director resides on a

Re: [Bacula-users] Solaris Packet size too big failures

2009-01-20 Thread Jason Dixon
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 04:36:00PM -0800, Conor Edberg wrote: I saw some mention of these past problems during my research, so I attempted to rule out network issues. In my case, the FD, SD, and dir are all on the same machine, so I assume the problem isn't switches or cabling. The

Re: [Bacula-users] Solaris Packet size too big failures

2008-12-23 Thread Conor Edberg
On Dec 9, 2008, at 2:36 PM, Jason Dixon wrote: On Tue, Dec 09, 2008 at 09:26:38PM +, Allan Black wrote: Jason Dixon wrote: Alas, I spoke too soon. The CatalogBackup job failed again last night, usual symptoms. OK. need to find out what the FD is doing. I would recommend: truss -o

Re: [Bacula-users] Solaris Packet size too big failures

2008-12-23 Thread Dan Langille
On Dec 23, 2008, at 11:53 AM, Conor Edberg wrote: On Dec 9, 2008, at 2:36 PM, Jason Dixon wrote: On Tue, Dec 09, 2008 at 09:26:38PM +, Allan Black wrote: Jason Dixon wrote: Alas, I spoke too soon. The CatalogBackup job failed again last night, usual symptoms. OK. need to find out

Re: [Bacula-users] Solaris Packet size too big failures

2008-12-23 Thread Conor Edberg
On Dec 23, 2008, at 3:38 PM, Dan Langille wrote: On Dec 23, 2008, at 11:53 AM, Conor Edberg wrote: On Dec 9, 2008, at 2:36 PM, Jason Dixon wrote: On Tue, Dec 09, 2008 at 09:26:38PM +, Allan Black wrote: Jason Dixon wrote: Alas, I spoke too soon. The CatalogBackup job failed again

Re: [Bacula-users] Solaris Packet size too big failures

2008-12-09 Thread Jason Dixon
On Fri, Dec 05, 2008 at 10:26:46PM -0500, Jason Dixon wrote: One final report. Everything has been working fine since switching the local FD to use the physical address (bge0) rather than loopback. Sounds like a bug. If anyone needs further details, please let me know. Alas, I spoke too

Re: [Bacula-users] Solaris Packet size too big failures

2008-12-09 Thread Allan Black
Jason Dixon wrote: Alas, I spoke too soon. The CatalogBackup job failed again last night, usual symptoms. OK. need to find out what the FD is doing. I would recommend: truss -o filename -f -a -e -v all -w 2 -p FD pid Is it possible to run the catalog backup during the day, by hand? That way

Re: [Bacula-users] Solaris Packet size too big failures

2008-12-09 Thread Jason Dixon
On Tue, Dec 09, 2008 at 09:26:38PM +, Allan Black wrote: Jason Dixon wrote: Alas, I spoke too soon. The CatalogBackup job failed again last night, usual symptoms. OK. need to find out what the FD is doing. I would recommend: truss -o filename -f -a -e -v all -w 2 -p FD pid Is it

Re: [Bacula-users] Solaris Packet size too big failures

2008-12-05 Thread Jason Dixon
On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 02:06:31PM -0500, Jason Dixon wrote: On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 07:02:16PM +, Allan Black wrote: Jason Dixon wrote: Wouldn't it fail consistently in that case? It hasn't failed the last two nights. Good :-) Has it started working since you changed from

Re: [Bacula-users] Solaris Packet size too big failures

2008-12-03 Thread Allan Black
Jason Dixon wrote: On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 01:01:12AM +0100, Kjetil Torgrim Homme wrote: Jason Dixon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 11:59:41AM +0100, Kshatriya wrote: recently. Since then, we've encountered frequent failures of the catalog backup job which reads from the

Re: [Bacula-users] Solaris Packet size too big failures

2008-12-03 Thread Jason Dixon
On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 06:35:51PM +, Allan Black wrote: Jason Dixon wrote: On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 01:01:12AM +0100, Kjetil Torgrim Homme wrote: Jason Dixon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 11:59:41AM +0100, Kshatriya wrote: recently. Since then, we've encountered

Re: [Bacula-users] Solaris Packet size too big failures

2008-12-03 Thread Allan Black
Jason Dixon wrote: Wouldn't it fail consistently in that case? It hasn't failed the last two nights. Good :-) Has it started working since you changed from localhost to real host name? Was it not just the catalog backup which was failing in this way? Anyway, if it starts happening again, it

Re: [Bacula-users] Solaris Packet size too big failures

2008-12-03 Thread Jason Dixon
On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 07:02:16PM +, Allan Black wrote: Jason Dixon wrote: Wouldn't it fail consistently in that case? It hasn't failed the last two nights. Good :-) Has it started working since you changed from localhost to real host name? It has stopped failing since that change.

Re: [Bacula-users] Solaris Packet size too big failures

2008-12-01 Thread Jason Dixon
On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 01:01:12AM +0100, Kjetil Torgrim Homme wrote: Jason Dixon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 11:59:41AM +0100, Kshatriya wrote: On Mon, 24 Nov 2008, Jason Dixon wrote: We moved our Bacula Director off Linux to Solaris (not my choice) recently.

Re: [Bacula-users] Solaris Packet size too big failures

2008-11-26 Thread Jason Dixon
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 11:59:41AM +0100, Kshatriya wrote: On Mon, 24 Nov 2008, Jason Dixon wrote: We moved our Bacula Director off Linux to Solaris (not my choice) recently. Since then, we've encountered frequent failures of the catalog backup job which reads from the local FD. They

Re: [Bacula-users] Solaris Packet size too big failures

2008-11-26 Thread Kshatriya
On Mon, 24 Nov 2008, Jason Dixon wrote: We moved our Bacula Director off Linux to Solaris (not my choice) recently. Since then, we've encountered frequent failures of the catalog backup job which reads from the local FD. They always fail with a Packet size too big error, which seems to be

Re: [Bacula-users] Solaris Packet size too big failures

2008-11-26 Thread Kjetil Torgrim Homme
Jason Dixon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 11:59:41AM +0100, Kshatriya wrote: On Mon, 24 Nov 2008, Jason Dixon wrote: We moved our Bacula Director off Linux to Solaris (not my choice) recently. Since then, we've encountered frequent failures of the catalog backup job

Re: [Bacula-users] Solaris Packet size too big failures

2008-11-25 Thread Jason Dixon
Just a quick bump. Perhaps I should open a bug report? Thanks, Jason On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 11:59:36AM -0500, Jason Dixon wrote: We moved our Bacula Director off Linux to Solaris (not my choice) recently. Since then, we've encountered frequent failures of the catalog backup job which reads

[Bacula-users] Solaris Packet size too big failures

2008-11-24 Thread Jason Dixon
We moved our Bacula Director off Linux to Solaris (not my choice) recently. Since then, we've encountered frequent failures of the catalog backup job which reads from the local FD. They always fail with a Packet size too big error, which seems to be more common with Windows hosts. Has anyone