Re: [Bacula-users] Why would bacula consider duplicate jobs as fatal?

2020-03-30 Thread David Brodbeck
On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 5:03 AM Radosław Korzeniewski < rados...@korzeniewski.net> wrote: > Hello, > > śr., 12 lut 2020 o 00:10 David Brodbeck > napisał(a): > >> One example of a situation where this actually makes sense is if your >> full backups take a lot longer than your incrementals. For exa

Re: [Bacula-users] Why would bacula consider duplicate jobs as fatal?

2020-02-17 Thread Radosław Korzeniewski
Hello, śr., 12 lut 2020 o 00:10 David Brodbeck napisał(a): > > > On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 1:54 AM Radosław Korzeniewski < > rados...@korzeniewski.net> wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> śr., 29 sty 2020 o 17:51 William Muriithi >> napisał(a): >> >>> >>> >> How would this make sense considering it was in

Re: [Bacula-users] Why would bacula consider duplicate jobs as fatal?

2020-02-17 Thread Radosław Korzeniewski
Hello, śr., 12 lut 2020 o 16:23 William Muriithi napisał(a): > > I think I do miss your point. Why anyone on Earth would like to > configure a backup job in such a way that the next job will intentionally > run when a previous job did not complete and intentionally setup > cancelation of the dup

Re: [Bacula-users] Why would bacula consider duplicate jobs as fatal?

2020-02-12 Thread William Muriithi
Morning Radosław, > I think I do miss your point. Why anyone on Earth would like to configure a > backup job in such a way that the next job will intentionally run when a > previous job did not complete and intentionally setup cancelation of the > duplicated job? > IMVHO if I knew that my back

Re: [Bacula-users] Why would bacula consider duplicate jobs as fatal?

2020-02-11 Thread David Brodbeck
On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 1:54 AM Radosław Korzeniewski < rados...@korzeniewski.net> wrote: > Hello, > > śr., 29 sty 2020 o 17:51 William Muriithi > napisał(a): > >> >> > How would this make sense considering it was intentionally configured? > > > I think I do miss your point. Why anyone on Earth

Re: [Bacula-users] Why would bacula consider duplicate jobs as fatal?

2020-01-31 Thread Radosław Korzeniewski
Hello, śr., 29 sty 2020 o 17:51 William Muriithi napisał(a): > Hello, > > Was trying to reduce the number of mails coming from Bacula, and was > combing through the logs to see what I can filter out. Currently, almost > all noise comes from bacula attempting to schedule a job and then realizing

Re: [Bacula-users] Why would bacula consider duplicate jobs as fatal?

2020-01-30 Thread Martin Simmons
> On Wed, 29 Jan 2020 16:16:31 +, William Muriithi said: > > Hello, > > Was trying to reduce the number of mails coming from Bacula, and was combing > through the logs to see what I can filter out. Currently, almost all noise > comes from bacula attempting to schedule a job and then real

Re: [Bacula-users] Why would bacula consider duplicate jobs as fatal?

2020-01-29 Thread Davide Franco
Hello William, On Wed, 29 Jan 2020 at 17:55, William Muriithi wrote: > Hello, > > Was trying to reduce the number of mails coming from Bacula, and was > combing through the logs to see what I can filter out. Currently, almost > all noise comes from bacula attempting to schedule a job and then r

[Bacula-users] Why would bacula consider duplicate jobs as fatal?

2020-01-29 Thread William Muriithi
Hello, Was trying to reduce the number of mails coming from Bacula, and was combing through the logs to see what I can filter out. Currently, almost all noise comes from bacula attempting to schedule a job and then realizing the previous isn't yet done. I have configured bacula not to allow d