2012/8/5 Phil Stracchino ala...@metrocast.net
On 08/05/12 05:57, d tbsky wrote:
First of all note that 5.2.10 is a considerably more recent version than
2.0.0, and does nut therefore fall under until 2.0.0. :) This should
answer your question...
but I didn't see any change log about
On Tue, Aug 07, 2012 at 02:26:51PM +0800, d tbsky wrote:
2012/8/5 Phil Stracchino ala...@metrocast.net
On 08/05/12 05:57, d tbsky wrote:
First of all note that 5.2.10 is a considerably more recent version than
2.0.0, and does nut therefore fall under until 2.0.0. :) This should
answer
2012/8/7 Uwe Schuerkamp uwe.schuerk...@nionex.net
In a way, yes, but we're not happy with it because of the extremely
long recycle times. Most of our backups run on the weekend, so as a
consequence or volume for that day is rather big and I've begun moving
large and / or long-running
I want to use single large volumes to backup because I need to rsync bacula
backup volumes to remote site. and I think a single large volume for every
job
(full,diff,inc every month,weekend,day) is better for rsync (it only need to
sync
different volumes after each job) .
if there are
hi:
I am new to bacula and I plan to use disk file to backup. the full
backup size is about 2TB。
I saw many warnings in the document about using large disk volumes to
backup, because
with a single Volume, is that until version 2.0.0, Bacula did not seek
within a
disk Volume, so restoring a
On 08/05/12 05:57, d tbsky wrote:
hi:
I am new to bacula and I plan to use disk file to backup. the full
backup size is about 2TB。
I saw many warnings in the document about using large disk volumes to
backup, because
with a single Volume, is that until version 2.0.0, Bacula did not
First of all note that 5.2.10 is a considerably more recent version than
2.0.0, and does nut therefore fall under until 2.0.0. :) This should
answer your question...
I agree been quite a few years of development from bacula-2.0.0 which
was released in January of 2007.
Although I stay away
