Re: [Bacula-users] schedule on different pools
Darien Hager schrieb:
On Feb 4, 2007, at 4:12 AM, Pierre Bernhardt wrote:
I have different pools created:
Dailyfor incremental backups
Weekly for differential backups
Monthly for full backups
If a Daily job executes and a full backup must be saved the bu
schould go automatically to the monthly pool. For Differential
it should use the Weekly pool.
So I've configured the following schedule directive in director
configuration.
Schedule {
Name = Cycle
Run = Level = Full 1st sun at 18:35
Run = Level = Differential Full Pool = Monthly 2nd-5th sun at 18:35
Run = Level = Incremental Full Pool = Monthly Differential Pool =
Weekly
mon-sat at 18:35
}
But the problem is, it will not work as I guess.
Where is the mistake?
1st it's looks like running without any changes. Not i the way I
understood but I still check them.
I can think of one issue which I encountered--if you do a
Differential or Incremental backup but no prior Full backup exists,
it becomes upgraded to Full. Because of this, you can possibly have a
Full backup done on any day, at least when you're starting out.
Yes, thats true. It's ok and the full backup should gone to monthly pool
instead of daily/weekly pool.
Myself, I realized I didn't care so much about whether it was a daily/
weekly/monthly backup, but actually I wanted to separate them by
their level, so my pools are full/diff/incr instead. If this is the
case for you, I would suggest you look at these three Job/JobDefs
directives:
Full Backup Pool = pool-resource-name
Differential Backup Pool = pool-resource-name
Incremental Backup Pool = pool-resource-name
I will check them. Possible it's easier to do that in this way.
These will override the pool specification depending on the level of
the backup. Using all three of them makes Pool = redundant. When
using them, I could remove the pool specifications from my schedule.
Thx. for help.
cu...
Pierre Bernhardt
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] schedule on different pools
Arno Lehmann schrieb:
Hello,
On 2/4/2007 1:12 PM, Pierre Bernhardt wrote:
Hello,
I have different pools created:
Dailyfor incremental backups
Weekly for differential backups
Monthly for full backups
If a Daily job executes and a full backup must be saved the bu
schould go automatically to the monthly pool. For Differential
it should use the Weekly pool.
So I've configured the following schedule directive in director
configuration.
Schedule {
Name = Cycle
Run = Level = Full 1st sun at 18:35
Run = Level = Differential Full Pool = Monthly 2nd-5th sun at 18:35
Run = Level = Incremental Full Pool = Monthly Differential Pool = Weekly
mon-sat at 18:35
}
But the problem is, it will not work as I guess.
Where is the mistake?
What do you expect the Full I marked above to do?
This means it should do a differential backup, but if no full backup
is made, the backup should go to the media pool Monthly instead of
media pool Weekly.
Apart from that, you've done the same I did for quite some time, and
which worked flawless.
Today, I prefer to set the pools for the backup levels in the job
definition, and link the pools to the storage device in the pool setup.
That is not possible with 1.36, by the way.
I'm using bacula 2.0.0 from the debian packages on sorceforge.
cu...
Pierre Bernhardt
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] schedule on different pools
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Pierre Bernhardt wrote: Full Backup Pool = pool-resource-name Differential Backup Pool = pool-resource-name Incremental Backup Pool = pool-resource-name I will check them. Possible it's easier to do that in this way. I don't think the other way will work, so it's quite likely that this way is easier. :-P - -- _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ |Y#| | | |\/| | \ |\ | | |Ryan Novosielski - Systems Programmer III |$| |__| | | |__/ | \| _| |[EMAIL PROTECTED] - 973/972.0922 (2-0922) \__/ Univ. of Med. and Dent.|IST/AST - NJMS Medical Science Bldg - C630 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFF4z9Smb+gadEcsb4RAgLYAKC3+eShB/fKUboMydhvDWNHUPG+jwCfRRDo SwovP7j4JwIHcUoDVT8iK/4= =aBcW -END PGP SIGNATURE- - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] schedule on different pools
I am jumping into the middle of this thread, please forgive me if I am
off base.
You can do this two ways. The first is to define the pools in the job
like this
Job {
Name = comp01
Type = Backup
Client = comp01-fd
FileSet = Windows C-drive
Schedule = WeeklyCycle
Storage = FileStorage0
Messages = Standard
Pool = 'Default'
##
Full Backup Pool = Monthly
Incremental Backup Pool = Daily
Differential Backup Pool = Weekly
##
Priority = 10
}
and this schedule
Schedule {
Name = WeeklyCycle
Run = Full 1st sun at 00:01
Run = Differential 2nd-5th sun at 00:01
Run = Incremental mon-sat at 00:01
}
The second way is to define the pools in the schedule like this:
Job {
Name = comp01
Type = Backup
Client = comp01-fd
FileSet = Windows C-drive
Schedule = Daily_Backup
Messages = Standard
Pool = Default
Priority = 10
}
Schedule {
Name = WeeklyCycle
Run = Level=Full Pool=Daily mon-sat at 00:01
Run = Level=Full Pool=Weekly 2nd-5th sun at 00:01
Run = Level=Full Pool=Monthly 1st sun at 00:01
}
Pierre Bernhardt wrote:
Darien Hager schrieb:
On Feb 4, 2007, at 4:12 AM, Pierre Bernhardt wrote:
I have different pools created:
Daily for incremental backups
Weekly for differential backups
Monthly for full backups
If a Daily job executes and a full backup must be saved the bu
schould go automatically to the monthly pool. For Differential
it should use the Weekly pool.
So I've configured the following schedule directive in director
configuration.
Schedule {
Name = Cycle
Run = Level = Full 1st sun at 18:35
Run = Level = Differential Full Pool = Monthly 2nd-5th sun at 18:35
Run = Level = Incremental Full Pool = Monthly Differential Pool =
Weekly
mon-sat at 18:35
}
But the problem is, it will not work as I guess.
Where is the mistake?
1st it's looks like running without any changes. Not i the way I
understood but I still check them.
I can think of one issue which I encountered--if you do a
Differential or Incremental backup but no prior Full backup exists,
it becomes upgraded to Full. Because of this, you can possibly have a
Full backup done on any day, at least when you're starting out.
Yes, thats true. It's ok and the full backup should gone to monthly pool
instead of daily/weekly pool.
Myself, I realized I didn't care so much about whether it was a daily/
weekly/monthly backup, but actually I wanted to separate them by
their level, so my pools are full/diff/incr instead. If this is the
case for you, I would suggest you look at these three Job/JobDefs
directives:
Full Backup Pool = pool-resource-name
Differential Backup Pool = pool-resource-name
Incremental Backup Pool = pool-resource-name
I will check them. Possible it's easier to do that in this way.
These will override the pool specification depending on the level of
the backup. Using all three of them makes Pool = redundant. When
using them, I could remove the pool specifications from my schedule.
Thx. for help.
cu...
Pierre Bernhardt
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] schedule on different pools
Darien Hager schrieb:
On Feb 4, 2007, at 4:12 AM, Pierre Bernhardt wrote:
I have different pools created:
Dailyfor incremental backups
Weekly for differential backups
Monthly for full backups
If a Daily job executes and a full backup must be saved the bu
schould go automatically to the monthly pool. For Differential
it should use the Weekly pool.
So I've configured the following schedule directive in director
configuration.
Schedule {
Name = Cycle
Run = Level = Full 1st sun at 18:35
Run = Level = Differential Full Pool = Monthly 2nd-5th sun at 18:35
Run = Level = Incremental Full Pool = Monthly Differential Pool =
Weekly
mon-sat at 18:35
}
But the problem is, it will not work as I guess.
Where is the mistake?
1st it's looks like running without any changes. Not i the way I
understood but I still check them.
I can think of one issue which I encountered--if you do a
Differential or Incremental backup but no prior Full backup exists,
it becomes upgraded to Full. Because of this, you can possibly have a
Full backup done on any day, at least when you're starting out.
Yes, thats true. It's ok and the full backup should gone to monthly pool
instead of daily/weekly pool.
Myself, I realized I didn't care so much about whether it was a daily/
weekly/monthly backup, but actually I wanted to separate them by
their level, so my pools are full/diff/incr instead. If this is the
case for you, I would suggest you look at these three Job/JobDefs
directives:
Full Backup Pool = pool-resource-name
Differential Backup Pool = pool-resource-name
Incremental Backup Pool = pool-resource-name
I will check them.Possible it's easier to do that in this way.
These will override the pool specification depending on the level of
the backup. Using all three of them makes Pool = redundant. When
using them, I could remove the pool specifications from my schedule.
Thx. for help.
--
cu...
Pierre Bernhardt
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] schedule on different pools
Arno Lehmann schrieb:
Hello,
On 2/4/2007 1:12 PM, Pierre Bernhardt wrote:
Hello,
I have different pools created:
Daily for incremental backups
Weeklyfor differential backups
Monthly for full backups
If a Daily job executes and a full backup must be saved the bu
schould go automatically to the monthly pool. For Differential
it should use the Weekly pool.
So I've configured the following schedule directive in director
configuration.
Schedule {
Name = Cycle
Run = Level = Full 1st sun at 18:35
Run = Level = Differential Full Pool = Monthly 2nd-5th sun at 18:35
Run = Level = Incremental Full Pool = Monthly Differential Pool = Weekly
mon-sat at 18:35
}
But the problem is, it will not work as I guess.
Where is the mistake?
What do you expect the Full I marked above to do?
This means it should do a differential backup, but if no full backup
is made, the backup should go to the media pool Monthly instead of
media pool Weekly.
Apart from that, you've done the same I did for quite some time, and
which worked flawless.
Today, I prefer to set the pools for the backup levels in the job
definition, and link the pools to the storage device in the pool setup.
That is not possible with 1.36, by the way.
I'm using bacula 2.0.0 from the debian packages on sorceforge.
cu...
Pierre Bernhardt
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] schedule on different pools
On Feb 4, 2007, at 4:12 AM, Pierre Bernhardt wrote:
I have different pools created:
Daily for incremental backups
Weeklyfor differential backups
Monthly for full backups
If a Daily job executes and a full backup must be saved the bu
schould go automatically to the monthly pool. For Differential
it should use the Weekly pool.
So I've configured the following schedule directive in director
configuration.
Schedule {
Name = Cycle
Run = Level = Full 1st sun at 18:35
Run = Level = Differential Full Pool = Monthly 2nd-5th sun at 18:35
Run = Level = Incremental Full Pool = Monthly Differential Pool =
Weekly
mon-sat at 18:35
}
But the problem is, it will not work as I guess.
Where is the mistake?
I can think of one issue which I encountered--if you do a
Differential or Incremental backup but no prior Full backup exists,
it becomes upgraded to Full. Because of this, you can possibly have a
Full backup done on any day, at least when you're starting out.
Myself, I realized I didn't care so much about whether it was a daily/
weekly/monthly backup, but actually I wanted to separate them by
their level, so my pools are full/diff/incr instead. If this is the
case for you, I would suggest you look at these three Job/JobDefs
directives:
Full Backup Pool = pool-resource-name
Differential Backup Pool = pool-resource-name
Incremental Backup Pool = pool-resource-name
These will override the pool specification depending on the level of
the backup. Using all three of them makes Pool = redundant. When
using them, I could remove the pool specifications from my schedule.
--
--Darien A. Hager
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mobile: (206) 734-5666
-
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier.
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] schedule on different pools
Hello,
On 2/4/2007 1:12 PM, Pierre Bernhardt wrote:
Hello,
I have different pools created:
Daily for incremental backups
Weeklyfor differential backups
Monthly for full backups
If a Daily job executes and a full backup must be saved the bu
schould go automatically to the monthly pool. For Differential
it should use the Weekly pool.
So I've configured the following schedule directive in director
configuration.
Schedule {
Name = Cycle
Run = Level = Full 1st sun at 18:35
Run = Level = Differential Full Pool = Monthly 2nd-5th sun at 18:35
Run = Level = Incremental Full Pool = Monthly Differential Pool = Weekly
mon-sat at 18:35
}
But the problem is, it will not work as I guess.
Where is the mistake?
What do you expect the Full I marked above to do?
Apart from that, you've done the same I did for quite some time, and
which worked flawless.
Today, I prefer to set the pools for the backup levels in the job
definition, and link the pools to the storage device in the pool setup.
That is not possible with 1.36, by the way.
Arno
MfG...
Pierre Bernhardt
-
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier.
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
--
IT-Service Lehmann[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Arno Lehmann http://www.its-lehmann.de
-
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier.
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
