Re: [Bacula-users] unable to label a tape

2010-11-04 Thread John Stoffel
Arnhold == Arnhold bacula-fo...@backupcentral.com writes: Arnhold Because the the link Arnhold /dev/tape/by-id/scsi-3500e09e0001af92f-nst is static. When Arnhold you change something in yout SCSI configuration the Arnhold devicefile /dev/nstX could be changed and you have to change Arnhold

[Bacula-users] unable to label a tape

2010-11-01 Thread Rene Arnhold
Hi At the Moment i try to configure a Bacula Backup Server. When I label a tape with the bconsole i get the following error.: 3999 Device /dev/tape/by-id/scsi-3500e09e0001af92f-nst not found or could not be opened I have searched but not found a solution for my problem. I have done a btape fill

Re: [Bacula-users] unable to label a tape

2010-11-01 Thread Francisco Javier Funes Nieto
Why don't you use the classic /dev/nst0 device format in the Device section? J. 2010/11/1 Rene Arnhold rene.arnh...@jena.de: Hi At the Moment i try to configure a Bacula Backup Server. When I label a tape with the bconsole i get the following error.: 3999 Device

[Bacula-users] unable to label a tape

2010-11-01 Thread Arnhold
Thanks for response. Because the the link /dev/tape/by-id/scsi-3500e09e0001af92f-nst is static. When you change something in yout SCSI configuration the devicefile /dev/nstX could be changed and you have to change your config. The symlinks /dev/tape/by* (or /dev/disk/by-* for hard drives) are

Re: [Bacula-users] unable to label a tape

2010-11-01 Thread Martin Simmons
On Mon, 01 Nov 2010 09:04:13 +0100, Rene Arnhold said: When I label a tape with the bconsole i get the following error.: 3999 Device /dev/tape/by-id/scsi-3500e09e0001af92f-nst not found or could not be opened ... bacula-dir.conf: ###

[Bacula-users] unable to label a tape

2010-11-01 Thread Arnhold
This should be Device = sdlt1600 to match the Device Name in the bacula-sd.conf. This was the solution. Device here means devicename in storage daemon and not devicefile. Many thanks Martin. +-- |This was sent by