Hello Daniele,
It has been released in the Enterprise addition at the end of February.
As I reported in my last status report (see www.bacula.org), I am now
backporting the changes from the Enterprise version. All the new
Enterprise SD plugins will not be available in the first community
ver
Hi Kern,
News about it?
Thanks,
Daniele
> Il giorno 18 ott 2016, alle ore 14:13, Kern Sibbald ha
> scritto:
>
> Hello,
>
> Bacula Systems has a White Paper on Bacula Enterprise Edition in the
> cloud, and they have given me permission to publish it. However, as it
> is currently written for
:29
To: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula in the cloud
From Bacula’s main.pdf documentation:
Max Run Time =
<time> The time specifies the
maximum allowed time t
On Wednesday 2016-10-19 06:41:53 Roberts, Ben wrote:
> The documentation is outdated and this limit was removed (or perhaps
> vastly increased?) somewhere around the 7 mark. I’ve had jobs running a
> lot longer since upgrading.
>
> In branch-5.2:
> http://www.bacula.org/git/cgit.cgi/bacula/tree/ba
ers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula in the cloud
From Bacula’s main.pdf documentation:
Max Run Time = The time specifies the maximum allowed time that a job
may run, counted from when the job starts, (not necessarily the same as when
the job was scheduled).
By default, the the watch
On Tuesday 2016-10-18 21:28:44 Clark, Patti wrote:
> From Bacula’s main.pdf documentation:
>
> Max Run Time = The time specifies the maximum allowed time that a
> job may run, counted from when the job starts, (not necessarily the
> same as when the job was scheduled). By default, the the watchdo
> Thank you all for your responses.
>
> I'll take a look at Bacula systems' whitepaper to see what they're
> talking about. Meanwhile I'll explore some of the alternatives
> discussed on this thread like copying files with scripts and making a
> replica on SpiderOak or anything similar.
Hello, J
;
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula in the cloud
On Tuesday 2016-10-18 12:34:08 Jason Voorhees wrote:
Thank you all for your responses.
I'll take a look at Bacula systems' whitepaper to see what they're
talking about. Meanwhile I'll explore some of the alternatives
discussed on t
On Tuesday 2016-10-18 12:34:08 Jason Voorhees wrote:
> Thank you all for your responses.
>
> I'll take a look at Bacula systems' whitepaper to see what they're
> talking about. Meanwhile I'll explore some of the alternatives
> discussed on this thread like copying files with scripts and making a
>
Thank you all for your responses.
I'll take a look at Bacula systems' whitepaper to see what they're
talking about. Meanwhile I'll explore some of the alternatives
discussed on this thread like copying files with scripts and making a
replica on SpiderOak or anything similar.
I hope we can have an
On 10/17/2016 09:37 PM, Jason Voorhees wrote:
> Hello guys:
>
> Based on your experience, what alternative do we have for backing up
> information to the cloud preferably using Bacula?
>
> I've been reading some posts about similar topics. Bandwidth always
> seem to be a problem because it isn't to
Hello,
Bacula Systems has a White Paper on Bacula Enterprise Edition in the
cloud, and they have given me permission to publish it. However, as it
is currently written for Bacula Enterprise customers it needs some
modification, which I will make over the next week or so then release it.
It dis
On 10/18/2016 3:42 AM, Uwe Schuerkamp wrote:
> Hello Jason,
>
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 09:37:12PM -0500, Jason Voorhees wrote:
>> Hello guys:
>>
>> Based on your experience, what alternative do we have for backing up
>> information to the cloud preferably using Bacula?
>>
> I wrote a script a whi
Hello Jason,
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 09:37:12PM -0500, Jason Voorhees wrote:
> Hello guys:
>
> Based on your experience, what alternative do we have for backing up
> information to the cloud preferably using Bacula?
>
I wrote a script a while ago that runs as a RunAfterJob element which
encrypt
14 matches
Mail list logo
