Re: [Bacula-users] Replacing WSB with Bacula - need help with hardware requirements

2011-02-17 Thread Fabio Almeida
Hi Vancho,

Here we have this hardware:
- Intel Xeon 1.6 QuadCore
- 4GB RAM
- Ubuntu (we have used FreeBSD too...)
- 1TB for spool
- TL2000 Tape library

We are currently backing up around 40 servers (Windows, Linux, *BSD*), 
with 10 max concurrent jobs, our FULL backup is around 5TB, which runs 
on weekends and for week days we run differential backups.

Our Bacula server runs smoothly, never using it's full resources, so 
maybe you can go with a less powerfull hardware, specially if you can 
setup the database on a different server, speaking of databases I 
recommend Postgres over MySQL, because as the tables grow with data, 
Postgres has proven to be faster and requires less maintenance work.

That's it, hope this can help :)
Fabio Almeida


On 02/17/11 03:30, Vancho Gjeorgjievski wrote:

 Hi guys,

 My name is Vancho, I work as a system engineer for small software 
 company located in Australia. The company I work for has 15 business 
 critical servers, based on Microsoft platform, which I manage on daily 
 basis, and one of the key ITSM services I provide is Backup 
 Management. We’re not satisfied with Windows Backup features and 
 performance, so we decided to replace it with Bacula. I read a lot 
 about this software and I found it to be quite in compliance with our 
 company’s requirements. Currently I’m preparing detailed design for 
 the Bacula deployment, and at the moment I’m facing difficulties 
 selecting the appropriate hardware for Bacula to run on. In the Bacula 
 documentation I couldn’t find the section that points to the minimal 
 or the optimal hardware requirements.

 So I thought to ask you to help me with my trouble, could you please 
 recommend which hardware would be most suitable for my environment? 
 The spread sheet contains the servers that consist our server farm. 
 Thanks in front! J

 Server

   

 Role

   

 OS

   

 Processor

   

 RAM

   

 HDD

   

 Network

 vartry

   

 DC

   

 Windows Server 2008 x86

   

 _2xXeon@2.7GHz mailto:2xXeon@2.7GHz_

   

 3GB

   

 40 GB

   

 100 Mbps Ethernet

 ryex2010svr01

   

 Exchange server 2010

   

 Windows Server 2008 R2 x64

   

 _2xXeon@3.6GHz mailto:2xXeon@3.6GHz_

   

 4GB

   

 150 GB

   

 100 Mbps Ethernet

 ulster

   

 CRM

   

 Windows Server 2008 x86

   

 _2xXeon@2.8GHz mailto:2xXeon@2.8GHz_

   

 2GB

   

 70 GB

   

 100 Mbps Ethernet

 galway

   

 Management server

   

 Windows Server 2003 x86

   

 _8xXeon@2.8GHz mailto:8xXeon@2.8GHz_

   

 4GB

   

 200 GB

   

 100 Mbps Ethernet

 croanbane

   

 SQL Server 2005 / 2008

   

 Windows Server 2003 x86

   

 _4xXeon@3GHz mailto:4xXeon@3GHz_

   

 3GB

   

 200 GB

   

 100 Mbps Ethernet

 shannon

   

 Sharepoint server

   

 Windows Server 2003 x86

   

 _4xXeon@2.7GHz mailto:4xXeon@2.7GHz_

   

 2GB

   

 70 GB

   

 100 Mbps Ethernet

 bellmount

   

 TeamFoundation server / SQL server

   

 Windows Server 2003 x86

   

 _2xXeon@3GHz mailto:2xXeon@3GHz_

   

 2GB

   

 150 GB

   

 100 Mbps Ethernet

 kilcoole

   

 SMTP gateway

   

 Windows Server 2003 x86

   

 _P3@647MHz mailto:P3@647MHz_

   

 128 MB

   

 25 GB

   

 100 Mbps Ethernet

 delgany

   

 Web (IIS) server

   

 Windows Server 2003 x86

   

 _2xXeon@3GHz mailto:2xXeon@3GHz_

   

 3GB

   

 100 GB

   

 100 Mbps Ethernet

 ms-isa

   

 Gateway server / ISA Firewall

   

 Windows Server 2003 x86

   

 _4xXeon@3.4GHz mailto:4xXeon@3.4GHz_

   

 4GB

   

 300 GB

   

 100 Mbps Ethernet

 antrim

   

 Application Server

   

 Windows Server 2003 x86

   

 _2xXeon@3Ghz mailto:2xXeon@3Ghz_

   

 2GB

   

 200 GB

   

 100 Mbps Ethernet

 luas

   

 HyperV host

   

 Windows Server 2008 R2 x64

   

 _4xi5@2.7GHz mailto:4xi5@2.7GHz_

   

 8GB

   

 2TB

   

 100 Mbps Ethernet

 kudos

   

 Application Server

   

 Windows Server 2008 R2 x64

   

 _2xXeon@3Ghz mailto:2xXeon@3Ghz_

   

 2GB

   

 200 GB

   

 100 Mbps Ethernet

 lee

   

 Sharepoint server

   

 Windows Server 2008 R2 x64

   

 _2xXeon@3Ghz mailto:2xXeon@3Ghz_

   

 2GB

   

 200 GB

   

 100 Mbps Ethernet

 Best Regards

 Gjeorgjievski Vancho

 System Engineer

 VB.NET Pty Ltd

 http://vb.net.au


 --
 The ultimate all-in-one performance toolkit: Intel(R) Parallel Studio XE:
 Pinpoint memory and threading errors before they happen.
 Find and fix more than 250 security defects in the development cycle.
 Locate bottlenecks in serial and parallel code that limit performance.
 http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devfeb


 

Re: [Bacula-users] Replacing WSB with Bacula - need help with hardware requirements

2011-02-17 Thread Mehma Sarja

On 2/16/11 9:30 PM, Vancho Gjeorgjievski wrote:


Hi guys,

My name is Vancho, I work as a system engineer for small software 
company located in Australia. The company I work  for has 15 business 
critical servers, based on Microsoft platform, which I manage on daily 
basis, and one of the key ITSM services I provide is Backup 
Management. We’re not satisfied with Windows Backup features and 
performance, so we decided to replace it with Bacula. I read a lot 
about this software and I found it to be quite in compliance with our 
company’s requirements. Currently I’m preparing detailed design for 
the Bacula deployment, and at the moment I’m facing difficulties 
selecting the appropriate hardware for Bacula to run on. In the Bacula 
documentation I couldn’t find the section that points to the minimal 
or the optimal hardware requirements.


So I thought to ask you to help me with my trouble, could you please 
recommend which hardware would be most suitable for my environment? 
The spread sheet contains the servers that consist our server farm. 
Thanks in front! J


Server



Role



OS



Processor



RAM



HDD



Network

vartry



DC



Windows Server 2008 x86



_2xXeon@2.7GHz mailto:2xXeon@2.7GHz_



3GB



40 GB



100 Mbps Ethernet

ryex2010svr01



Exchange server 2010



Windows Server 2008 R2 x64



_2xXeon@3.6GHz mailto:2xXeon@3.6GHz_



4GB



150 GB



100 Mbps Ethernet

ulster



CRM



Windows Server 2008 x86



_2xXeon@2.8GHz mailto:2xXeon@2.8GHz_



2GB



70 GB



100 Mbps Ethernet

galway



Management server



Windows Server 2003 x86



_8xXeon@2.8GHz mailto:8xXeon@2.8GHz_



4GB



200 GB



100 Mbps Ethernet

croanbane



SQL Server 2005 / 2008



Windows Server 2003 x86



_4xXeon@3GHz mailto:4xXeon@3GHz_



3GB



200 GB



100 Mbps Ethernet

shannon



Sharepoint server



Windows Server 2003 x86



_4xXeon@2.7GHz mailto:4xXeon@2.7GHz_



2GB



70 GB



100 Mbps Ethernet

bellmount



TeamFoundation server / SQL server



Windows Server 2003 x86



_2xXeon@3GHz mailto:2xXeon@3GHz_



2GB



150 GB



100 Mbps Ethernet

kilcoole



SMTP gateway



Windows Server 2003 x86



_P3@647MHz mailto:P3@647MHz_



128 MB



25 GB



100 Mbps Ethernet

delgany



Web (IIS) server



Windows Server 2003 x86



_2xXeon@3GHz mailto:2xXeon@3GHz_



3GB



100 GB



100 Mbps Ethernet

ms-isa



Gateway server / ISA Firewall



Windows Server 2003 x86



_4xXeon@3.4GHz mailto:4xXeon@3.4GHz_



4GB



300 GB



100 Mbps Ethernet

antrim



Application Server



Windows Server 2003 x86



_2xXeon@3Ghz mailto:2xXeon@3Ghz_



2GB



200 GB



100 Mbps Ethernet

luas



HyperV host



Windows Server 2008 R2 x64



_4xi5@2.7GHz mailto:4xi5@2.7GHz_



8GB



2TB



100 Mbps Ethernet

kudos



Application Server



Windows Server 2008 R2 x64



_2xXeon@3Ghz mailto:2xXeon@3Ghz_



2GB



200 GB



100 Mbps Ethernet

lee



Sharepoint server



Windows Server 2008 R2 x64



_2xXeon@3Ghz mailto:2xXeon@3Ghz_



2GB



200 GB



100 Mbps Ethernet



Vancho,

You have about 4 TB worth of drives and if you are saving 1/2 of that, 
your space needs are 2 TB + whatever scheme(retention, incremental, etc) 
you plan use. I'd get a  Coraid.com AOE storage machine with a minimal, 
stable Linux server running bacula SD and DIR as the head - and about 4 
GB of RAM. I'd populate it with enterprise drives no larger than 750 GB.


Why AOE ? - it is built-in into the Linux kernel and is simple, fast and 
stable technology.  It will handle RAID and their 15-bay will be 
scalable. It has 3 PSUs for redundancy. It is fairly cheap and you can 
use whichever enterprise drives you want.


Mehma




--
The ultimate all-in-one performance toolkit: Intel(R) Parallel Studio XE:
Pinpoint memory and threading errors before they happen.
Find and fix more than 250 security defects in the development cycle.
Locate bottlenecks in serial and parallel code that limit performance.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devfeb___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users


Re: [Bacula-users] Replacing WSB with Bacula - need help with hardware requirements

2011-02-16 Thread Gary R. Schmidt
Hi Vancho,

Short answer - none of them.

Bacula no longer actively supports Windows as the director OS.

Go to MSY and buy a quad-core box with 8/12/16/26/96GB RAM and a handful
of 2TB disks, get a tape autoloader, install the Linux/BSD/Solaris of your
choice, and Bob's Your Uncle.

Of course, if you are going to go the disk-based backup route, you could
install VirtualBox/VMWare/Xen on one of your Windows boxen and then put
Linux/BSD/Solaris on that...

I'd offer to help, but you are in Sydney, and no-one worth worrying about
is in Sydney :-).  (Of *course* I'm in Melbourne, where else would I be.)

Cheers,
GaryB-)





--
The ultimate all-in-one performance toolkit: Intel(R) Parallel Studio XE:
Pinpoint memory and threading errors before they happen.
Find and fix more than 250 security defects in the development cycle.
Locate bottlenecks in serial and parallel code that limit performance.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devfeb
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users