There are lot of people here with 2003-2004 DTSi models running on
gas-shocks, I myself was using them before switching to ZMA shocks.
Though am not aware of the cost- I would say go ahead and buy it.
Regards,
Deepak
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 9:42 AM, mazumdar devarajan mazumd...@yahoo.com wrote:
Thanks Deepak,
Rate the performance which is good ?
Rds
Mazumdar
See the Web#39;s breaking stories, chosen by people like you. Check out
Yahoo! Buzz. http://in.buzz.yahoo.com/
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
The damping/travel of the gas-shocks is more than the ZMA shockers-
this is obvious since the ZMA is a heavier bike with comparatively
more weight distributed at the rear. But when it comes to the harsh
bumps you get on bad roads- the ZMA shocks soaks up the torture and
transforms it into a much
You're welcome. But I would also suggest to try for the classic CBZ
shocks. Also long back had ridden one Pulsar belonging to Sunny
Thukral (silent member here), with the CBZ shocks. They were very
comforting. I thought the CBZ and ZMA shocks were the same- came to
know they are not.
Regards,
Hi,
I am using feb 2004 pulsar DTSI model with normal shocks.
I am planning to going for new shocks .
I searched and the response says the new pulsar air shocks not fit with old
bikes. So my question is
1) can i go with new pulsar air shocks if so how much it costs.
2) do i have any
