Hey Michael,
> This looks familiar. I have a similar patch that sets SDHCI_INT_DATA_AVAIL
> only if the command is a READ, but I didn't yet have time to verify, that this
> is the correct fix.
Can you please send it to me?
Thanks,
Michael
___
On Wed, 05 May 2021 09:40:29 +, Michael Graichen wrote:
[...]
> I'm currently booting from SDcard and i have not realised any problems with
> the FAT support so far. But with the arasan-sdhci driver when writing, see
> my patch below which fixes it for me but I haven't dived into the drivers
>
Hey Lucas,
> Seems you imported this patch from somewhere and it left some traces in
> the commit message?
yes, sorry, my local mirror. I will fix that.
> Also I don't understand what this change is supposed to be doing. You
> are building just another Barebox binary, with no real differences
Hello Michael,
Hello Lucas,
On 05.05.21 10:15, Lucas Stach wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> Am Montag, dem 03.05.2021 um 10:07 + schrieb Michael Graichen:
>> Since OCRAM is only 192K this introduces CONFIG_ZYNQ_BUILD_FSBL so we can
>> can chainload a more feature rich barebox via bootm.
>>
>> From
Hi Michael,
Am Montag, dem 03.05.2021 um 10:07 + schrieb Michael Graichen:
> Since OCRAM is only 192K this introduces CONFIG_ZYNQ_BUILD_FSBL so we can can
> chainload a more feature rich barebox via bootm.
>
> From 1f1a95eca42198d73c38cc12b9b44f061980cef8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From:
Since OCRAM is only 192K this introduces CONFIG_ZYNQ_BUILD_FSBL so we can can
chainload a more feature rich barebox via bootm.
>From 1f1a95eca42198d73c38cc12b9b44f061980cef8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Michael Graichen
Date: Mon, 3 May 2021 12:03:05 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] zynq: add support
