On Thu, 18 Aug 2022 07:04:45 +0200
Ahmad Fatoum <a.fat...@pengutronix.de> wrote:

Hi!

It looks like the commit 5dba4f6b3d3 ("pbl: export pbl_barebox_verify") from 
the next branch
breaks the socfpga-xload-2_defconfig config build.

Here are the error messages:

crypto/digest.c:78:5: warning: no previous prototype for ‘digest_algo_register’ 
[-Wmissing-prototypes]
   78 | int digest_algo_register(struct digest_algo *d)
      |     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
crypto/digest.c:98:6: warning: no previous prototype for 
‘digest_algo_unregister’ [-Wmissing-prototypes]
   98 | void digest_algo_unregister(struct digest_algo *d)
      |      ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
crypto/digest.c:150:6: warning: no previous prototype for ‘digest_algo_prints’ 
[-Wmissing-prototypes]
  150 | void digest_algo_prints(const char *prefix)
      |      ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
crypto/digest.c:162:16: error: redefinition of ‘digest_alloc’
  162 | struct digest *digest_alloc(const char *name)
      |                ^~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from crypto/digest.c:17:
include/digest.h:99:30: note: previous definition of ‘digest_alloc’ with type 
‘struct digest *(const char *)’
   99 | static inline struct digest *digest_alloc(const char *name)
      |                              ^~~~~~~~~~~~
crypto/digest.c:183:16: error: redefinition of ‘digest_alloc_by_algo’
  183 | struct digest *digest_alloc_by_algo(enum hash_algo hash_algo)
      |                ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/digest.h:104:30: note: previous definition of ‘digest_alloc_by_algo’ 
with type ‘struct digest *(enum hash_algo)’
  104 | static inline struct digest *digest_alloc_by_algo(enum hash_algo algo)
      |                              ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
crypto/digest.c:204:6: error: redefinition of ‘digest_free’
  204 | void digest_free(struct digest *d)
      |      ^~~~~~~~~~~
include/digest.h:109:20: note: previous definition of ‘digest_free’ with type 
‘void(struct digest *)’
  109 | static inline void digest_free(struct digest *d)
      |                    ^~~~~~~~~~~
crypto/digest.c:259:5: warning: no previous prototype for ‘digest_file_window’ 
[-Wmissing-prototypes]
  259 | int digest_file_window(struct digest *d, const char *filename,
      |     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
crypto/digest.c:291:5: warning: no previous prototype for ‘digest_file’ 
[-Wmissing-prototypes]
  291 | int digest_file(struct digest *d, const char *filename,
      |     ^~~~~~~~~~~
crypto/digest.c:304:5: warning: no previous prototype for ‘digest_file_by_name’ 
[-Wmissing-prototypes]
  304 | int digest_file_by_name(const char *algo, const char *filename,
      |     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
make[1]: *** [/home/antony/barebox/scripts/Makefile.build:137: 
crypto/digest.pbl.o] Error 1
make: *** [Makefile:953: crypto] Error 2
make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....




> There's no downside to always build the digest verification code in PBL
> and export pbl_barebox_verify to access it. This allows board code to
> use the function for verifying other firmware blobs and
> CONFIG_PBL_VERIFY_PIGGY=y will remain to enable the verification at
> barebox proper extraction time. Code not using it will have the function
> sections garbage collected by the linker, so no functional change.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fat...@pengutronix.de>
> ---
> v1 -> v2:
>   - no change
> ---
>  crypto/Makefile | 3 +--
>  include/pbl.h   | 3 +++
>  pbl/decomp.c    | 6 +++---
>  3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/crypto/Makefile b/crypto/Makefile
> index 762d7e543be4..22035d4f69ee 100644
> --- a/crypto/Makefile
> +++ b/crypto/Makefile
> @@ -10,8 +10,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_DIGEST_MD5_GENERIC)    += md5.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_DIGEST_SHA1_GENERIC)    += sha1.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_DIGEST_SHA224_GENERIC)  += sha2.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_DIGEST_SHA256_GENERIC)  += sha2.o
> -pbl-$(CONFIG_PBL_VERIFY_PIGGY)               += sha2.o
> -pbl-$(CONFIG_PBL_VERIFY_PIGGY)               += digest.o
> +pbl-y                                        += sha2.o digest.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_DIGEST_SHA384_GENERIC)  += sha4.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_DIGEST_SHA512_GENERIC)  += sha4.o
>  obj-y        += memneq.o
> diff --git a/include/pbl.h b/include/pbl.h
> index 0dc23c72dcf5..7dc4fa309257 100644
> --- a/include/pbl.h
> +++ b/include/pbl.h
> @@ -30,4 +30,7 @@ const void *
>  fdt_device_get_match_data(const void *fdt, const char *nodepath,
>                         const struct fdt_device_id ids[]);
>  
> +int pbl_barebox_verify(const void *compressed_start, unsigned int len,
> +                    const void *hash, unsigned int hash_len);
> +
>  #endif /* __PBL_H__ */
> diff --git a/pbl/decomp.c b/pbl/decomp.c
> index 1e0ef81ada00..553895bac5e8 100644
> --- a/pbl/decomp.c
> +++ b/pbl/decomp.c
> @@ -54,14 +54,14 @@ static void noinline errorfn(char *error)
>  extern unsigned char sha_sum[];
>  extern unsigned char sha_sum_end[];
>  
> -static int pbl_barebox_verify(void *compressed_start, unsigned int len, void 
> *hash,
> -                           unsigned int hash_len)
> +int pbl_barebox_verify(const void *compressed_start, unsigned int len,
> +                    const void *hash, unsigned int hash_len)
>  {
>       struct sha256_state sha_state = { 0 };
>       struct digest d = { .ctx = &sha_state };
>       char computed_hash[SHA256_DIGEST_SIZE];
>       int i;
> -     char *char_hash = hash;
> +     const char *char_hash = hash;
>  
>       if (hash_len != SHA256_DIGEST_SIZE)
>               return -1;
> -- 
> 2.30.2
> 
> 


-- 
Best regards,
  Antony Pavlov

Reply via email to