As a fyi: 21.1.3 tarball doesn't build on Rhel9/clang using the existing
SPEC files and instructions
The most obvious issue is that clang treats all warnings as errors and the
MD5 code is deprecated, however it still falls over after this is overridden
The build-test script building from the
e and work out what changes are needed for the SPEC
file
On Monday, 27 June 2022 at 10:34:40 UTC+1 Alan Brown wrote:
> As a fyi: 21.1.3 tarball doesn't build on Rhel9/clang using the existing
> SPEC files and instructions
>
> The most obvious issue is that clang treats all warnings as
/55131772/how-to-check-for-redhat-rhel-minor-version-in-rpm-spec-file
Centos is so closely tied into RHEL these days that I doubt the
centos_version macro is working correctly either
Should I post the diff here or pastebin?
On Monday, 27 June 2022 at 14:49:39 UTC+1 Alan Brown wrote:
> us
} >= 700 ||
0%{?fedora_version} >= 16 || 0%{?suse_version} >= 1110
---
> %if 0%{?rhel} >= 7 || 0%{?centos_version} >= 700 || 0%{?fedora_version}
>= 16 || 0%{?suse_version} >= 1110
913c913
< %if 0%{?centos_version} == 700 || 0%{?rhel_version} == 700
---
>
reos*.so" -maxdepth
1 -exec rm {} \;
---
> find %{buildroot}/%{library_dir} -maxdepth 1 -type l -name
"libbareos*.so" -exec rm {} \;
On Tuesday, 28 June 2022 at 10:00:55 UTC+1 Alan Brown wrote:
> Extra EL8 requires "so far"
>
>
> EPEL!
>
> gtest-devel
bably would also accept a PR changing rhel_version to rhel, ...
> against master.
>
> I hope, this helps.
>
> Regards,
> Jörg
>
> On 28.06.22 at 11:00 wrote Alan Brown:
> > Extra EL8 requires "so far"
> >
> >
> > EPEL!
> &
