baroque lutes of the type that we mostly
use to
play solos.
Bill
From: Jean-Marie Poirier jmpoiri...@wanadoo.fr
To: William Samson willsam...@yahoo.co.uk
Sent: Wednesday, 30 November 2011, 18:27
Subject: Re: [BAROQUE-LUTE] Re: A=392
What about
.
By the way, all 24 keys are represented in the 30 preludes.
arthur
- Original Message -
From: Jean-Marie Poirier jmpoiri...@wanadoo.fr
To: baroque-lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
Sent: Friday, December 02, 2011 8:19 AM
Subject: [BAROQUE-LUTE] Re: A=392
I forgot to mention that the lute music
On Wed, 30 Nov 2011 18:26:57 -0800, Nancy Carlin wrote
One of the things that is really intersting about John Wilson is that
he wrote a series of fantasties in all (many?) keys.
In all keys, IIRC. And also some warmup exercises as well.
These re for English theorbo with the first string
Check out 'From the fair lavinian shore' from Balcarres - attributed
elsewhere to John Wilson.
Number 51:
http://scottishlute.com/balcarres/
Rob
On 1 December 2011 10:55, R. Mattes r...@mh-freiburg.de wrote:
On Wed, 30 Nov 2011 18:26:57 -0800, Nancy Carlin wrote
One of the things that is
missed something?
Bill
From: Martyn Hodgson hodgsonmar...@yahoo.co.uk
To: Anthony Hind agno3ph...@yahoo.com; Baroque lute Dmth
baroque-lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
Sent: Tuesday, 29 November 2011, 12:46
Subject: [BAROQUE-LUTE] Re: A=392
I think the same applies to lute accompaniment
.
regards
Martyn
--- On Wed, 30/11/11, William Samson willsam...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
From: William Samson willsam...@yahoo.co.uk
Subject: [BAROQUE-LUTE] Re: A=392
To: Martyn Hodgson hodgsonmar...@yahoo.co.uk
Cc: baroque-lute@cs.dartmouth.edu baroque-lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
To: Martyn Hodgson hodgsonmar...@yahoo.co.uk
Cc: baroque-lute@cs.dartmouth.edu baroque-lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2011 1:35 AM
Subject: [BAROQUE-LUTE] Re: A=392
I sometimes wonder why I haven't come across much in the way of
contemporary agonisings about pitch
From: Martyn Hodgson hodgsonmar...@yahoo.co.uk
Subject: Re: [BAROQUE-LUTE] Re: A=392
To: David van Ooijen davidvanooi...@gmail.com
Date: Wednesday, 30 November, 2011, 10:18
Thank you for this.
So, if I understand you right, the early lute players could all
On 30 November 2011 11:18, Martyn Hodgson hodgsonmar...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
So, if I understand you right, the early lute players could all transpose
tablature on sight - have you any evidence for this assertion?
You also suggest we shouldn't discuss such matters... I wonder why?
Oh
From: Martyn Hodgson hodgsonmar...@yahoo.co.uk
Subject: Re: [BAROQUE-LUTE] Re: A=392
To: David van Ooijen davidvanooi...@gmail.com
Date: Wednesday, 30 November, 2011, 13:46
Thank you for this.
I think the same general query applies to modern players too - what
On 30 November 2011 14:46, Martyn Hodgson hodgsonmar...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
I think the same general query applies to modern players too - what evidence
have you for your assertion that all experienced players can transpose
tablature on sight?
Gosh, there goes my English again! Did I really
On Nov 30, 2011, at 12:35 AM, William Samson wrote:
I sometimes wonder why I haven't come across much in the way of
contemporary agonisings about pitch standards and compatibility of
lutes with their wide range of scale lengths for a given nominal
pitch. Presumably this would have been
For most players, pitch was a given. If you lived in London in 1720
and the local pitch was A=410, you tuned your lute to A=410 or you
couldn't play with other instrumentalists else, which would make you
useless as a musician.
Not necessarily that straightforward - Suppose you had
A : howard posner howardpos...@ca.rr.com; baroque lute list
baroque-lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
Envoye le : Mardi 29 Novembre 2011 5h18
Objet : [BAROQUE-LUTE] Re: A=392
Hi-After just playing it now, I like the basses but the 1st and
2nd courses could be higher tension of course so I think I
, 9:06
Subject: [BAROQUE-LUTE] Re: A=392
My 70 cm Warwick works well at 392Hz. While going from 407Hz to
392Hz,
I wanted to raise the tension of the basses slightly, so I just
shifted
them along one increment (C1 to D2 etc). However, I changed most of
the
mid and top
baroque-lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
Envoyé le : Mardi 29 Novembre 2011 10h27
Objet : [BAROQUE-LUTE] Re: A=392
As far as I can see the only show-stopper for a lute tuned to 392Hz is
ensemble work, when the other musicians are tuned to a higher pitch
standard - usually 415Hz. That's where a 66cm
- Mail original -
De : Martyn Hodgson hodgsonmar...@yahoo.co.uk
À : William Samson willsam...@yahoo.co.uk; baroque-lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
baroque-lute@cs.dartmouth.edu; Anthony Hind agno3ph...@yahoo.com
Cc :
Envoyé le : Mardi 29 Novembre 2011 12h58
Objet : [BAROQUE-LUTE] Re: A=392
Dear
with 'perfect' (modern) pitch..
Martyn
--- On Tue, 29/11/11, Anthony Hind agno3ph...@yahoo.com wrote:
From: Anthony Hind agno3ph...@yahoo.com
Subject: Re : [BAROQUE-LUTE] Re: A=392
To: Martyn Hodgson hodgsonmar...@yahoo.co.uk
Date: Tuesday, 29 November, 2011, 12:11
On Nov 28, 2011, at 5:15 PM, sterling price wrote:
My question is: should I
just tune the same 415 strings down or get a new set of strings for
392?
Yes. Those are pretty much the only two options.
Right now it is at 392 but I'm wondering if it might sound better
with new strings.
, 2011 7:15 PM
Subject: [BAROQUE-LUTE] Re: A=392
On Nov 28, 2011, at 5:15 PM, sterling price wrote:
My question is: should I
just tune the same 415 strings down or get a new set of strings for
392?
Yes. Those are pretty much the only two options.
Right now
20 matches
Mail list logo
