On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 04:58:51PM -0800, troy engel wrote:
> I have a CentOS4 system (server parts only) and see that it's even
> more dumb than I thought; a new patch is on the way, I made the
> initial macro definitions as lowly basic as possible, which makes it a
> lot more portable. Basically
On 3/8/07, Chris Frey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I've tested the build on a RHEL4 system just now, and rpm-4.3 chokes
> on the %if statements for some reason. I also had to tweak the autoconf
I have a CentOS4 system (server parts only) and see that it's even
more dumb than I thought; a new pa
On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 04:11:39PM -0800, troy engel wrote:
> Given what I know people do (which, granted is solely from my
> experience and contacts) when it comes to a device like a BB they
> *will* be logged in as the console user. This device is user-centric,
> it will be with the user ("crackb
On 3/8/07, Chris Frey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> This doesn't seem to be portable on systems such as Debian stable, so
> in the best case for this feature, it will still be limited to RPM
> installs on systems that support it.
I would say that, much like the udev rules, we could simply rename
On Sun, Mar 04, 2007 at 01:47:18PM -0800, troy engel wrote:
> (sent using wrong email address, trying a resend. sorry if I break
> your email client threading)
It worked fine.
First of all, Thanks! This is a great benefit, and should make version 0.7
the first release with binary RPM's included
Hi folks,
I'm looking at Troy's recent patch for udev permissions, and it sets the
ownership of your recently-plugged-in Blackberry to the current console
owner.
I'm not convinced this is the right approach, but am willing to be
convinced. Some reasons I have against it:
- it is not por
