Re: gerrit for osmocom-bb

2017-04-20 Thread Vadim Yanitskiy
Hi, > I'm not sure if it's just me or if I'm using it wrong but > I'm always annoyed when I have to login to gerrit ... +1 here, Gerrit login is (for now) a bit unfriendly. Even so, there are also some advantages to have OsmocomBB in Gerrit: - Jenkins builder: maintainers / reviewers don't

Re: gerrit for osmocom-bb

2017-04-20 Thread Neels Hofmeyr
On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 10:18:57AM +0200, Neels Hofmeyr wrote: > In the redmine admin, I see an "Autologin: disabled" item that can be set > to 1, 7, 30 or 365 days. I'd switch that to 30 days if everyone agrees. Actually, I set it to 30 days now. Please tell me if you disagree and I'll set it

Re: gerrit for osmocom-bb

2017-04-20 Thread Neels Hofmeyr
On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 09:01:30PM +0200, Sylvain Munaut wrote: > Hi, > > > One issue that I fear is that I see very little activity outside of the > > sysmocom team in gerrit in terms of review. I had the feeling this was > > better while posting patches still on the mailing lists. I'm not

Re: gerrit for osmocom-bb

2017-04-19 Thread Harald Welte
Hi Sylvain, On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 09:01:30PM +0200, Sylvain Munaut wrote: > I'm not sure if it's just me or if I'm using it wrong but I'm always > annoyed when I have to login to gerrit ... thanks for raising this issue. It is probably as simple as to extend the cookie expiration or something

Re: gerrit for osmocom-bb

2017-04-19 Thread Sylvain Munaut
Hi, > One issue that I fear is that I see very little activity outside of the > sysmocom team in gerrit in terms of review. I had the feeling this was > better while posting patches still on the mailing lists. I'm not sure > there is a causality. I'm not sure if it's just me or if I'm using it

Re: gerrit for osmocom-bb

2017-04-19 Thread Harald Welte
Hi Max, On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 03:31:52PM +0200, Max wrote: > I've just noticed that OsmocomBB is not on the list of projects at > https://gerrit.osmocom.org/#/admin/projects/ > Is this because nobody bothered adding it there yet or it's because > maintainers do > not find it suitable? If it's