Re: [basex-talk] Shouldn't condition and true be a no-op?

Dear Christian, Thanks! It's true(), i didn't know that! Constants as zero-ary functions is certainly consistent with Universal Algebrahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universal_algebra. So, i'm sympathetic to this design. Best wises, --greg On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 9:52 AM, Christian Grün

[basex-talk] Module versioning for new packaging system

Howdy -- For the most part, I'm glad to have the non-EXPath packaging mechanism introduced for 7.2.1 -- particularly given how the EXPath implementation in BaseX has some unintended side effects (ie. loading all modules when only one is referenced). However, I wonder if perhaps the current

[basex-talk] Concurrency, maximum number of concurrent users / queries

Dear readers, I have a question about concurrency. In the documentation I read that the default amount of concurrent reads is 8. But as it seems quite low, is this just a number, or is BaseX limited on this aspect? How many concurrent readers / writers does BaseX support? Would it be possible

Re: [basex-talk] Module versioning for new packaging system

For the most part, I'm glad to have the non-EXPath packaging mechanism introduced for 7.2.1 -- [...] - No mechanism for atomically upgrading a module exists; it must be uninstalled, then installed again, leaving an intermediate period in which the module is unavailable. We could add a

Re: [basex-talk] Concurrency, maximum number of concurrent users / queries

Dear Peter, In the documentation I read that the default amount of concurrent reads is 8. But as it seems quite low, is this just a number, or is BaseX limited on this aspect? thanks for your e-mail. The default value of 8 concurrent reads has been experimentally chosen as a good average