On Mon, 2020-10-05 at 15:15 +0200, Christian Grün wrote:
> Hi Liam,
>
> Did you find out why II et al. was ignored? Feel free to provide me
> with a little test case.
The markup in the surrogate files in the database turned out to be,
Edward II
Changing to Edward II made it work.
Henry VIII
Hi Liam,
Did you find out why II et al. was ignored? Feel free to provide me
with a little test case.
Cheers,
Christian
On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 3:55 AM Liam R. E. Quin wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2020-09-28 at 19:32 -0400, Liam R. E. Quin wrote:
> > At
> >
> > https://words.fromoldbooks.org/Search/
>
Hi Liam,
Maybe you could translate those tag contents into the
corresponding unicode symbols. At least I would hope that text
searching algorithms deal with that kind of expansion already, that
they match vii with Ⅶ and ⅶ.
Best regards,Kristian Kankainen
Ühel kenal päeval, E, 28.09.2020 kell
On Mon, 2020-09-28 at 19:32 -0400, Liam R. E. Quin wrote:
> At
>
> https://words.fromoldbooks.org/Search/
>
> a search for henry shows lots of matches, and sodoes a search for
> henry
> i, but henry ii and henry viis missing and so is henry viii.
Actually it turns out (1) Henry VIII doesn't
At
https://words.fromoldbooks.org/Search/
a search for henry shows lots of matches, and sodoes a search for henry
i, but henry ii and henry viis missing and so is henry viii.
I can search for viii and find Henry VIII and also Charles VIII, but i
also can't search for Charles VIII.
I can search
5 matches
Mail list logo