В сообщении от 27 августа 2011 00:38:55 автор Matt Rogers написал:
> On Aug 25, 2011 9:46 PM, "ilusionoflife"
>
> wrote:
> > What do you think about it? Should we use it?
> > I think yes, because we already use POSIX-only features, such as fork and
> > popen. Then compiler is nearly definitely gc
On Aug 25, 2011 9:46 PM, "ilusionoflife"
wrote:
>
> What do you think about it? Should we use it?
> I think yes, because we already use POSIX-only features, such as fork and
> popen. Then compiler is nearly definitely gcc, so why not take advantage
of
> things like for(auto &key, container).
> Now
We actually do have users on both Windows and Mac OS X. I'd like to hold off
on c++11 for now until it becomes more widely adopted or we have a clear need
for the features -- most of the new features can be implemented just as easily
using Qt features (like QWeakPointer) for now.
On Thursday,
What do you think about it? Should we use it?
I think yes, because we already use POSIX-only features, such as fork and
popen. Then compiler is nearly definitely gcc, so why not take advantage of
things like for(auto &key, container).
Now i am working on refactoring different classes and find, th
