On Sat, 2003-12-06 at 13:34, Thomas DeWeese wrote:
> Since that time it has become clear that Apache is moving
> towards a much more rigid stance on this issue. So I
> need to ask if you have an Apache CLA on file.
No, but if you feel it's required, I'll fax one over right away.
No problem. (
Hello..
About a month back I submitted a bug I found to this list..
No response..?
So I'm now wondering if the SVGGraphics2D is really supposed to crash on
an exception when encoding a 16-bit bitmap?
I'd sure like to know and if this is not a 'feature', was there a
problem with the short fix I
Sorry, sent the last mail prematurely by accident,
Here is a patch for the bug:
--- PNGImageEncoder.java2003-11-11 08:37:21.0 +0100
+++ org/apache/batik/ext/awt/image/codec/PNGImageEncoder.java 2003-11-11
15:21:52.0 +0100
@@ -296,6 +296,7 @@
private int colorType;
Hi,
I'm new to Batik, but I found what seems to be a bug in:
org/apache/batik/ext/awt/image/codec/PNGImageEncoder.java
The encoder throws an exception if the image color channels have
different bit-depths. This is probably a good sanity-check in most
cases, but 16-bit RGB color modes usually ha