RE: 1.1.1 transcoding

2001-12-21 Thread Anthony Shawver
-Original Message- From: Thierry Kormann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 4:07 AM To: Batik Users; Anthony Shawver Subject: Re: 1.1.1 transcoding Your test.svg file does not have the proper DOCTYPE to say that this is an SVG document. So you should add the foll

Re: 1.1.1 transcoding

2001-12-21 Thread Thierry Kormann
On Thursday 20 December 2001 19:35, Anthony Shawver wrote: > I created simple little test program to illustrate my problem. The test > program has 2 parts; the first part reads an SVG file from disk(I enclosed > the one (test.svg) that I used for testing) & transcodes(this works). The > second

RE: 1.1.1 transcoding

2001-12-20 Thread Jeff Kowalczyk
I'd like to offer in a newbies perspective here: The first (and initially, only) think many of us are trying to get Batik to do is on-demand servlet rendering of http-request SVG input to http-response PNG or JPEG output. I think there would be a cadre of us grateful to have conspicuously linked

RE: 1.1.1 transcoding

2001-12-20 Thread Thomas E Deweese
> "AS" == Anthony Shawver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: AS> Thanks, Thierry. I appreciate your time & help. However, I am still not AS> getting it to work. AS> I created simple little test program to illustrate my problem. Good test, now we can really help you I think... AS> So from

RE: 1.1.1 transcoding

2001-12-20 Thread Anthony Shawver
]] Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 12:08 PM To: Batik Users; Anthony Shawver Subject: Re: 1.1.1 transcoding On Wednesday 19 December 2001 17:50, Anthony Shawver wrote: > Thanks, David. However I still get the problem: > > Previously when transcoding, I used the new TranscoderInput(

Re: 1.1.1 transcoding

2001-12-19 Thread Thierry Kormann
On Wednesday 19 December 2001 17:50, Anthony Shawver wrote: > Thanks, David. However I still get the problem: > > Previously when transcoding, I used the new TranscoderInput(String URI) > constructor for input, and everything works fine. My output stream size is > about 5k in this instance. > >

RE: 1.1.1 transcoding

2001-12-19 Thread Anthony Shawver
t;document" version of transcode successfully? Thanks, Tony -Original Message- From: David Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 3:52 AM To: 'Batik Users' Subject: RE: 1.1.1 transcoding I cannot vouch for the xml transcoders, but it works fine wit

RE: 1.1.1 transcoding

2001-12-19 Thread David Smith
I cannot vouch for the xml transcoders, but it works fine with svg transcoders in both 1.0 and 1.1 -Original Message- From: Anthony Shawver [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 18 December 2001 22:56 To: Batik Users Subject: 1.1.1 transcoding Hi All, I created an application with version 1.