RE: 1.1.1 transcoding

2001-12-19 Thread David Smith
I cannot vouch for the xml transcoders, but it works fine with svg transcoders in both 1.0 and 1.1 -Original Message- From: Anthony Shawver [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 18 December 2001 22:56 To: Batik Users Subject: 1.1.1 transcoding Hi All, I created an application with version

RE: More info Re: Batik over JNLP

2001-12-19 Thread David Smith
Will there be an update to the Java Web Start in light of this? It will be a bit limiting if I need to supply an updated jar file to everyone who downloads my application. -Original Message- From: Vincent Hardy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 18 December 2001 13:01 To: [EMAIL

Re: More info Re: Batik over JNLP

2001-12-19 Thread Vincent Hardy
David Smith wrote: Will there be an update to the Java Web Start in light of this? It will be a bit limiting if I need to supply an updated jar file to everyone who downloads my application. I don't know. The one I looked at was the one coming with MacOS X 10.1. I think the request should

RE: 1.1.1 transcoding

2001-12-19 Thread Anthony Shawver
Thanks, David. However I still get the problem: Previously when transcoding, I used the new TranscoderInput(String URI) constructor for input, and everything works fine. My output stream size is about 5k in this instance. transcoder.transcode(new TranscoderInput(uri), new

Re: 1.1.1 transcoding

2001-12-19 Thread Thierry Kormann
On Wednesday 19 December 2001 17:50, Anthony Shawver wrote: Thanks, David. However I still get the problem: Previously when transcoding, I used the new TranscoderInput(String URI) constructor for input, and everything works fine. My output stream size is about 5k in this instance.