Apologies for the offtopicness of the question so first, if you know any place
where the questions would not be off topic let me know (please, no
stackoverflow...)
The question is, I'm trying to recover from a 20 years lag in CSS development
and I thought working first on a site where I can't
Kerri,
Thank you for the comment. I'll try that too.
I eventually asked the same question on reddit and it seems that the HTML
should contain a
like tag.
https://www.reddit.com/r/css/comments/eft71n/iphone_safari_does_not_respond_to_maxwidth_media/
Do you agree that's the case ?
I'll be
Jean, that is correct. The viewport parameter is required in all AMP-compliant
HTML documents, as well as a canonical URL meta tag and other things.
For the record, several years ago, when I first learned about the benefits of
using the AMP standard, I knew absolutely nothing about it. So, I
Hi,
>From a quick guess without checking I’d assume you’re missing the viewport
>meta tag. Have a look here, hope it helps:
>https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Mozilla/Mobile/Viewport_meta_tag
Best,
Holger
> On 26 Dec 2019, at 4:42 PM, Jean-Christophe Helary
> wrote:
>
> Apologies
Take a look at CSS 'resolution'.
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/resolution
There's a -webkit prefix for Safari.
Also, using em measurements for your breakpoints is unconventional. I
typically use pixels.
--Kerri
On Thu, Dec 26, 2019, 3:42 AM Jean-Christophe Helary <
Thank you for checking Holger,
That was indeed the case.
JC
> On Dec 26, 2019, at 17:57, 'Holger Bartel' via BBEdit Talk
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> From a quick guess without checking I’d assume you’re missing the viewport
> meta tag. Have a look here, hope it helps:
>
Jean, just as an added point, while full AMP compliance may not be your
ultimate goal, I think it is important to point out that whether we like it or
not, when it comes to Internet search, Google is the indisputable king.
Having said that, for those of us who are seeking maximum exposure for
> On Dec 26, 2019, at 23:34, Bill Kochman wrote:
>
> Jean, just as an added point, while full AMP compliance may not be your
> ultimate goal, I think it is important to point out that whether we like it
> or not, when it comes to Internet search, Google is the indisputable king.
Hence the
Bill,
Thank you very much for the comment.
> On Dec 26, 2019, at 22:40, Bill Kochman wrote:
>
> Jean, that is correct. The viewport parameter is required in all
> AMP-compliant HTML documents, as well as a canonical URL meta tag and other
> things.
I'm not aiming at AMP compliance (I
