On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 09:37:41PM +0200, Michael Buesch wrote:
On Sunday 16 April 2006 21:09, Marc Singer wrote:
I'm using a 3 year old notebook computer with a built-in BCM 4306
chip. When I turn-up the interface, I see this in the dmesg log.
bcm43xx: PHY connected
bcm43xx: Radio turned on
bcm43xx: Chip initialized
bcm43xx: DMA initialized
bcm43xx: 80211 cores initialized
bcm43xx: TODO: Incomplete code in keymac_write() at
drivers/net/wireless/bcm43xx/bcm43xx_main.c:1119
bcm43xx: TODO: Incomplete code in keymac_write() at
drivers/net/wireless/bcm43xx/bcm43xx_main.c:1119
...
The code says:
} else {
if (index 8) {
TODO(); /* Put them in the macaddress filter */
} else {
TODO();
* This is the one.
/* Put them BCM43xx_SHM_SHARED, stating index 0x0120.
Keep in mind to update the count of keymacs in 0x003E
as well! */
}
Does this mean this chip isn't yet supported?
Uhm, did you actually _try_ to use it?
Of course I tried it. The driver doesn't associate. Once it's turned up
# ip link set eth1 up
it never gets carrier. The AP is unencrypted and unprotected.
# ip link show eth1
3: eth1: NO-CARRIER,BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen
1000
link/ether 00:90:96:67:24:17 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
I've even set the ESS explicitly. iwlist scan shows a list of APs.
The iwconfig even shows that it knows the MAC of the AP. Still, no carrier.
I asked about the message because it suggests that something needs to
be done. The comment doesn't say why.
The other thing I did that I'm not sure about is I used firmware from
a driver other than the one provided by the manufacturer. I read
somewhere that it doesn't matter which version we use as long as
fwcutter and the driver accept it. The manufacturer's firmware is too
old for both.
___
Bcm43xx-dev mailing list
Bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de
http://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/bcm43xx-dev
