Hello,
we have been testing the firmware for a week now and it seems stable.
I personally tested it also on a Linksys WRT54GL and it works both in
station and in AP modes. I collected the feedbacks that some of you
sent and it seems that the firmware now runs on these board:
- 4306, 4311,
On Fri, 2009-01-23 at 18:36 +0100, Francesco Gringoli wrote:
Hello,
we have been testing the firmware for a week now and it seems stable.
I personally tested it also on a Linksys WRT54GL and it works both in
station and in AP modes.
Did you try pushing it hard? i.e. doing a nice big
Francesco Gringoli wrote:
Hello,
we have been testing the firmware for a week now and it seems stable. I
personally tested it also on a Linksys WRT54GL and it works both in
station and in AP modes. I collected the feedbacks that some of you sent
and it seems that the firmware now runs on
On Friday 23 January 2009 18:36:37 Francesco Gringoli wrote:
Hello,
we have been testing the firmware for a week now and it seems stable.
I personally tested it also on a Linksys WRT54GL and it works both in
station and in AP modes. I collected the feedbacks that some of you
sent and
On Friday 23 January 2009 19:01:00 Larry Finger wrote:
The driver can certainly be coded to look for the open-source firmware
names before trying to load vendor firmware. That way there will not
be any confusion.
I already posted that, but in case you missed it:
On Friday 23 January 2009 19:50:37 Dan Williams wrote:
On Fri, 2009-01-23 at 19:08 +0100, Michael Buesch wrote:
On Friday 23 January 2009 19:01:00 Larry Finger wrote:
The driver can certainly be coded to look for the open-source firmware
names before trying to load vendor firmware. That
On Jan 23, 2009, at 7:02 PM, Michael Buesch wrote:
On Friday 23 January 2009 18:36:37 Francesco Gringoli wrote:
Hello,
we have been testing the firmware for a week now and it seems stable.
I personally tested it also on a Linksys WRT54GL and it works both in
station and in AP modes. I
On Jan 23, 2009, at 7:01 PM, Larry Finger wrote:
Francesco Gringoli wrote:
Hello,
we have been testing the firmware for a week now and it seems
stable. I
personally tested it also on a Linksys WRT54GL and it works both in
station and in AP modes. I collected the feedbacks that some of
On Friday 23 January 2009 20:18:52 Francesco Gringoli wrote:
Nothing. Why do we need to have different names?
Well, I was only considering a question raised by John, we can surely
maintain these names.
I guess I missed that. What was the question?
Note that proprietary and open firmwares
On Friday 23 January 2009 20:24:47 Francesco Gringoli wrote:
On Jan 23, 2009, at 7:01 PM, Larry Finger wrote:
Francesco Gringoli wrote:
Hello,
we have been testing the firmware for a week now and it seems
stable. I
personally tested it also on a Linksys WRT54GL and it works both
Francesco Gringoli wrote:
Damn... that would be a very hard writing We do not have any 4311/2
board: at first glance there are more condition registers whose meaning
we do not know. Very different hardware, didn't know. Thank you for the
feedback.
By the way: is that device inside an
On Jan 23, 2009, at 8:33 PM, Michael Buesch wrote:
On Friday 23 January 2009 20:18:52 Francesco Gringoli wrote:
Nothing. Why do we need to have different names?
Well, I was only considering a question raised by John, we can surely
maintain these names.
I guess I missed that. What was the
On Friday 23 January 2009 20:46:45 Francesco Gringoli wrote:
-- Is using the Broadcom names for the firmware the best course of
-- action? What if the opensource firmware files were named something
-- like os-ucode5.fw, etc. and b43 were coded to check for those files
-- first? It would then
On Jan 23, 2009, at 8:37 PM, Michael Buesch wrote:
On Friday 23 January 2009 20:24:47 Francesco Gringoli wrote:
On Jan 23, 2009, at 7:01 PM, Larry Finger wrote:
Francesco Gringoli wrote:
Hello,
we have been testing the firmware for a week now and it seems
stable. I
personally tested it
On Jan 23, 2009, at 6:44 PM, Brian J. Murrell wrote:
On Fri, 2009-01-23 at 18:36 +0100, Francesco Gringoli wrote:
Hello,
we have been testing the firmware for a week now and it seems stable.
I personally tested it also on a Linksys WRT54GL and it works both in
station and in AP modes.
Did
First probe for proprietary firmware and then probe for opensource firmware.
This way around it's a win-win situation.
1) If proprietary fw is available, it will work.
2) If opensource firmware is available, but no proprietary (Distros can only
ship open fw)
it might work.
3) If both open and
Michael Buesch wrote:
First probe for proprietary firmware and then probe for opensource firmware.
This way around it's a win-win situation.
1) If proprietary fw is available, it will work.
2) If opensource firmware is available, but no proprietary (Distros can only
ship open fw)
it
On Saturday 24 January 2009 06:04:47 Larry Finger wrote:
Michael Buesch wrote:
First probe for proprietary firmware and then probe for opensource firmware.
This way around it's a win-win situation.
1) If proprietary fw is available, it will work.
2) If opensource firmware is available,
18 matches
Mail list logo
