Hi! Allan and Mark,
Please do not take my silence as ignore or disrespect.
I have read Mark's writing else where and I accept that it is in all
probability right or close by. I have no method other my pendulum to
check his writing and that gives an enthusiastic approval.
When one sees how far aw
Dear Nancy,
Allan leaned on me to weigh in on this issue. What Mark Purdy says makes
immanent sense. To explain the lack of up-take by officialdom of Mark's
thesis you don't have to go too far. The industries processing manganese
wouldn't like it to come to the fore, and there is widespread envir
Nancy - Thank you so very much for taking the time to externalize
your appreciation and some of your concerns. I've passed both on to
Mark.
-Allan
> >>I have to admit, however, that I'm pretty concerned that Mark Pudey's
>>>thesis has not raised one question or even a comment on BD Now!
>>>
Thanks for taking the time to write, Woody.
I think the big issue here is that misinformation from 'the
authorities' about the source of mad cow disease is interferring with
our ability to do the work you described.
I spoke yesterday with a BD farmer who can no longer store his horns
in a nei
>>I have to admit, however, that I'm pretty concerned that Mark Pudey's
>>thesis has not raised one question or even a comment on BD Now!
>>
>>Talk about dissing someone's life work!!
No dissing at all! maybe just acceptance that his theory makes a lot more sense than
the official one. Congratu
Well, Allan...
I'd assumed from the get-go that the official explanation and response to
Mad Cow was bogus, along with hoof-and-mouth, and for that matter AIDS,
cancer, vaccinations and all the rest. Mark's work simply confirms what we
know already: that Government, the Medical Establishment, th
