[beagleboard] Re: [beagle-alpha] Building a device tree overlay for your new PocketCape design

2018-01-17 Thread Robert Nelson
On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 5:57 PM, Joshua Datko wrote: > Hey Jason, > > First of all thanks for all the work (and from many others on this) for the > BeagleBone et. al.! > > This is just my 2c and it's probably worth that much. > > What I would say is that it shouldn't matter

[beagleboard] Re: [beagle-alpha] Building a device tree overlay for your new PocketCape design

2018-01-17 Thread Jason Kridner
For pinmux only, existing tools could be reimplemented or modified, but the real challenge is in the hundreds of possible drivers and their configurations. It would be interesting to see if those could automatically be extracted from a running kernel with symbols. On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 6:58 PM

[beagleboard] Re: [beagle-alpha] Building a device tree overlay for your new PocketCape design

2018-01-17 Thread Joshua Datko
Hey Jason, First of all thanks for all the work (and from many others on this) for the BeagleBone et. al.! This is just my 2c and it's probably worth that much. What I would say is that it shouldn't matter that the board uses device tree or . What designers of capes want, I think, is the