Thanks. I had to go back to 4.14 since the newest distro broke some things
which is taking me a while to figure out. I did however, eliminate
bonescript and I'm ~ 40 seconds which is almost tolerable.
--
For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss
---
You received this message
Hi Paul,
I am also trying to make my PocketBeagle startup time faster and after
disabling a lot of scripts I saw little progress until I disabled
bonescript-autorun.service
sudo systemctl disable bonescript-autorun.service
You don’t see it when you run 'systemd-analyze blame' but look at the
>
> The newest image is certainly an improvement, but my results are not quite
> what yours are. Two quick questions:
1. Is the dev-mmcblk0p1.device time affected by SD card speed? I'm at a
loss why mine is 8 seconds slower than yours.
2. Is there a way to identify the time consuming
On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 11:32 AM Paul Beam wrote:
>
> Robert,
>
> I have been working with the LTS 4.14 ti branch. Is 4.19 better? To be
> honest, I don't remember the image I started with, but I started 6+ months
> ago. I'm in a position where I can basically start fresh if there are
>
Robert,
I have been working with the LTS 4.14 ti branch. Is 4.19 better? To be
honest, I don't remember the image I started with, but I started 6+ months
ago. I'm in a position where I can basically start fresh if there are
advantages.
On Thursday, April 23, 2020 at 11:37:10 AM UTC-4,
> 2.649s loadcpufreq.service
>707ms cpufrequtils.service
It's safe to disable cpufrequtils, by default it's already running at
1Ghz out of u-boot and with Performance enabled
with the default kernel..
It's more for legacy..
debian@beaglebone:~$ systemd-analyze
Startup
On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 10:29 AM Robert Nelson wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 7:42 AM wrote:
> >
> > I have done that, but I am perplexed with the results I posted – I think
> > that was from a different unit as I have several in various states of
> > development. From what I have read,
On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 7:42 AM wrote:
>
> I have done that, but I am perplexed with the results I posted – I think that
> was from a different unit as I have several in various states of development.
> From what I have read, the usb gadget takes most of the userspace time. On
> the one
for so many boards,
but on the other hand I find their size and complexity daunting to tramps
through and figure out.
From: beagleboard@googlegroups.com On Behalf Of
Daniel Kulp
Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2020 3:43 PM
To: BeagleBoard
Subject: Re: [beagleboard] Re: PocketBeagle Boot Time
The first step would be to delete any initrd images in /boot. That will
likely chop about 10 seconds off the "kernel" time. I'm not sure why
we're creating the initrd things.
On Sunday, April 19, 2020 at 3:38:00 PM UTC-4, rpau...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> Thanks. I will look at that
Thanks. I will look at that thread. My recent efforts have resulted in
negative process.
Startup finished in 17.476s (kernel) + 41.899s (userspace) = 59.376s
From: beagleboard@googlegroups.com On Behalf Of
TJF
Sent: Saturday, April 18, 2020 2:04 PM
To: BeagleBoard
Subject: [beagleboard]
11 matches
Mail list logo
