Re: [beagleboard] Maxim Codec and BBB a different way.

2016-05-04 Thread Jack Mitchell
On 02/05/16 08:13, Rick Mann wrote: I agree. I've been trying to get a simple audio codec to work for over a year. It worked in 3.1.x, but now in 4.4.x it's marginal, at best (one channel works, not the other). I've been a bit lazy to see what the working 3.1.x version had different. But,

Re: [beagleboard] Maxim Codec and BBB a different way.

2016-05-02 Thread Rick Mann
I agree. I've been trying to get a simple audio codec to work for over a year. It worked in 3.1.x, but now in 4.4.x it's marginal, at best (one channel works, not the other). I've been a bit lazy to see what the working 3.1.x version had different. But, it's really complicated, very poorly

[beagleboard] Maxim Codec and BBB a different way.

2016-05-02 Thread J dog
I am updating our project page for an advanced remotely controlled audio system using the BBB and a Maxim Codec 98089. We use a different method for alsa-soc than most. Our DTB driver only uses I2S and no I2C control mechanism is included in it. We think this makes the I2S routine cleaner