What surprises me is that why, if the precision of PRUs is their selling
point, the original docs do not say a lot about it: when the precision is
there, when it is not. Thus, thank you for these clarifications! I was
afraid about a rare, occasional jitter, but if it works well for you...
--
Hi, I have read an intro about PRUs
http://www.staroceans.org/documents/TI-sdk/spry264.pdf "each PRU has its
own *single-cycle I/O*"
Well, nice. Let's look further...
http://processors.wiki.ti.com/index.php/Programmable_Realtime_Unit "Content
is no longer maintained and is being kept for
Hi, I have read this nice ad for PRUs
http://www.staroceans.org/documents/TI-sdk/spry264.pdf which states how
deterministic the PRUs are,
"*each PRU has its own single-cycle I/O*" etc. Then I wanted details...
http://processors.wiki.ti.com/index.php/Programmable_Realtime_Unit "Content
is*
Please disregard, original thread is in the PRU subsection, posted here by
mistake...
On Tuesday, January 8, 2019 at 2:45:06 PM UTC+1, daveyj...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> Hi, I have read an intro about PRUs
> http://www.staroceans.org/documents/TI-sdk/spry264.pdf "each PRU has its
> own
Hi Charles and lazarman,
I do not do anything serious enough to require certificates stating that
these docs are true, I just wanted to have the docs... Just "it will be one
or two cycles if" which, if true, is likely known by the designers of
the chip. Which I eventually got from Charles'
