[Beaker-devel] Re: Future directions for the Beaker test harness

2018-03-12 Thread Jeffrey Burke
On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 3:13 AM, Róman Joost wrote: > Dear Jeff, > > On Fri, Mar 09, 2018 at 08:12:19AM -0500, Jeffrey Burke wrote: >> On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 6:45 PM, Róman Joost wrote: >> > Dear Jeff, >> > >> > On Thu, Mar 08, 2018 at 09:00:43AM -0500,

[Beaker-devel] Re: Future directions for the Beaker test harness

2018-03-12 Thread Róman Joost
Dear Jeff, On Fri, Mar 09, 2018 at 08:12:19AM -0500, Jeffrey Burke wrote: > On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 6:45 PM, Róman Joost wrote: > > Dear Jeff, > > > > On Thu, Mar 08, 2018 at 09:00:43AM -0500, Jeffrey Burke wrote: > >> > Our current idea is to make restraint the default harness

[Beaker-devel] Re: Future directions for the Beaker test harness

2018-03-08 Thread Róman Joost
Dear Jeff, On Thu, Mar 08, 2018 at 09:00:43AM -0500, Jeffrey Burke wrote: > > Our current idea is to make restraint the default harness for RHEL8+ and > > therefore slowly phase out beah (as the default). That includes getting > > restraint to achieve feature parity with beah. I don't have an

[Beaker-devel] Re: Future directions for the Beaker test harness

2018-03-08 Thread Jeffrey Burke
On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 10:53 PM, Róman Joost wrote: > Dear Jeff, > > On Wed, Mar 07, 2018 at 08:25:47AM -0500, Jeffrey Burke wrote: >> On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 3:18 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote: >> > - Original Message - >> >> Excerpts from Amit Saha's

[Beaker-devel] Re: Future directions for the Beaker test harness

2018-03-07 Thread Róman Joost
Dear Jeff, On Wed, Mar 07, 2018 at 08:25:47AM -0500, Jeffrey Burke wrote: > On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 3:18 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote: > > - Original Message - > >> Excerpts from Amit Saha's message of 2014-08-20 14:04 +10:00: > [...] > > Yep, lets start with some

[Beaker-devel] Re: Future directions for the Beaker test harness

2018-03-07 Thread Jeffrey Burke
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 3:18 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote: > - Original Message - >> Excerpts from Amit Saha's message of 2014-08-20 14:04 +10:00: >> > 1. If we do not allow selecting the base image, we are effectively >> > *not* obeying >> > the distro selection in the job