On Mon, 2005-05-23 at 20:13 +0600, Progga wrote:
All your assumptions are okay IMO. Since The Mozilla Bangla Translation
Project doesn't fullfill these criterion, I never considered it part of
Ankur and never bothered a bit about it. I am urging the Ankurians to totally
forget it ( of
On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 02:57:20PM +0530, Sayamindu Dasgupta wrote:
OOo bn is a part of Ankur.
We are even using the ektaaraa logo on the front page of
bn.openoffice.org :)
Good. bn ami ashtesi ;-) /bn
pgp7ak037rOZg.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- Original Message -
From: Sayamindu Dasgupta [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Now - I think if a particular project meets all these requirements - and
if the project coordinator makes an announcement of the project at
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (though, I am myself guilty of not doing so for the
OOo
Hi all,
This is my second mail on this topic - and this is probably the most
difficult to handle :).
Until now, there has been no formal definition of what an Ankur Project
is. However, after seeing the recent flame wars, I think we should move
towards some kind policy defining what an Ankur
