Re: [bess] draft-mohanty-bess-evpn-bum-opt-00 - clarification on problem description

2018-03-24 Thread Ali Sajassi (sajassi)
Hi Jorge, As I pointed out in my previous email, the use of flag is not a viable option because it requires update to every single PE for it to be effective. Before getting too much into a new solution with many restrictions, we should evaluate the current mechanisms and if they fall short,

Re: [bess] draft-mohanty-bess-evpn-bum-opt-00 - clarification on problem description

2018-03-24 Thread Ali Sajassi (sajassi)
Hi John, Your suggestion (of defining a flag mcast flag EC) requires that in addition to gateways upgrade, all other PEs to be upgraded. I think option-A in my earlier email is the best option for Sandy’s use case and it provide that with the existing WG drafts without inventing/developing a

Re: [bess] draft-mohanty-bess-evpn-bum-opt-00 - clarification on problem description

2018-03-24 Thread Ali Sajassi (sajassi)
Eric, Jorge, At the time I wrote RFC 7432, I had an implicit assumption that IMET routes advertisement is based on EVI/BD configuration only and thus it is not dependent on failure scenario, single-homing scenario, etc. If there was not a better option to solve Sandy’s use case, then I would

Re: [bess] draft-mohanty-bess-evpn-bum-opt-00 - clarification on problem description

2018-03-24 Thread Satya Mohanty (satyamoh)
Some additional comments inline [Satya] From: BESS > on behalf of Sandy Breeze > Date: Saturday, March 24, 2018 at 11:39 AM To: "Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View)"

Re: [bess] draft-mohanty-bess-evpn-bum-opt-00 - clarification on problem description

2018-03-24 Thread Sandy Breeze
John, Eric, Jorge, [Sandy] Comments inline On 24/03/2018, 10:57, "Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View)" > wrote: Eric, as discussed and you point out, one can easily interpret that IMET is not mandatory in some cases where

Re: [bess] draft-mohanty-bess-evpn-bum-opt-00 - clarification on problem description

2018-03-24 Thread Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View)
Eric, as discussed and you point out, one can easily interpret that IMET is not mandatory in some cases where multi-destination traffic is not needed. In any case, whether this document is Informational or Standards Track is probably not that important. If this had to be done, out of the