Re: [bess] WG adoption poll for draft-malhotra-bess-evpn-unequal-lb-04

Same here. Support since this is very useful From: BESS on behalf of EXT Jeff Tantsura Date: Tuesday, 4 September 2018 at 11:45 To: "Acee Lindem (acee)" Cc: Stephane Litkowski , "bess@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [bess] WG adoption poll for draft-malhotra-bess-evpn-unequal-lb-04 Yes/support On

[bess] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bess-evpn-per-mcast-flow-df-election-00.txt

A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the BGP Enabled ServiceS WG of the IETF. Title : Per multicast flow Designated Forwarder Election for EVPN Authors : Ali Sajassi

Re: [bess] WG adoption poll for draft-malhotra-bess-evpn-unequal-lb-04

Support for WG adoption Cheers Kris From: BESS on behalf of "stephane.litkow...@orange.com" Date: Tuesday, September 4, 2018 at 12:29 AM To: "bess@ietf.org" Subject: [bess] WG adoption poll for draft-malhotra-bess-evpn-unequal-lb-04 Hi WG, This email begins a two-week poll for BESS working

Re: [bess] WG adoption poll for draft-malhotra-bess-evpn-unequal-lb-04

Hi, Support WG adoption as co-author. I am not aware of any IPR related to this document. Thanks, Neeraj On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 12:29 AM wrote: > Hi WG, > > > > This email begins a two-week poll for BESS working group adoption > draft-malhotra-bess-evpn-unequal-lb-04 [1] > > > > Please

Re: [bess] WG adoption poll for draft-malhotra-bess-evpn-unequal-lb-04

Support. Thanks Mankamana From: BESS on behalf of "stephane.litkow...@orange.com" Date: Tuesday, September 4, 2018 at 12:29 AM To: "bess@ietf.org" Subject: [bess] WG adoption poll for draft-malhotra-bess-evpn-unequal-lb-04 Hi WG, This email begins a two-week poll for BESS working group

Re: [bess] WG adoption poll for draft-malhotra-bess-evpn-unequal-lb-04

Support Thanks, Jim Uttaro From: BESS [mailto:bess-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of LINGALA, AVINASH Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2018 9:32 AM To: stephane.litkow...@orange.com; bess@ietf.org Subject: Re: [bess] WG adoption poll for draft-malhotra-bess-evpn-unequal-lb-04

Re: [bess] WG adoption poll for draft-malhotra-bess-evpn-unequal-lb-04

Support, not aware of any IPR. Yours Irrespectively, John From: BESS On Behalf Of stephane.litkow...@orange.com Sent: Tuesday, September 4, 2018 3:29 AM To: bess@ietf.org Subject: [bess] WG adoption poll for draft-malhotra-bess-evpn-unequal-lb-04 Hi WG, This email begins a two-week poll for

Re: [bess] WG adoption poll for draft-malhotra-bess-evpn-unequal-lb-04

As a co-author , I support for WG adoption. I am not aware of any IPR relevant to this document. ​ Thanks, Avinash Lingala From: BESS On Behalf Of stephane.litkow...@orange.com Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2018 3:29 AM To: bess@ietf.org Subject: [bess] WG adoption poll for

Re: [bess] A question regarding Single-Active ES redundancy mode and DF election in RFC 7432

Krzysztof, You are right, the Port-Active draft uses a different technique for DF election. Regards, Sasha Office: +972-39266302 Cell: +972-549266302 Email: alexander.vainsht...@ecitele.com From: Krzysztof Szarkowicz [mailto:kszarkow...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 4, 2018 3:04 PM

Re: [bess] A question regarding Single-Active ES redundancy mode and DF election in RFC 7432

Hi Sasha, Yes, the end result is sort of Port-Active from the draft you reference, although the tool set (DF election methodology) is not the same. Thanks, > On 2018-Sep-04, at 13:53, Alexander Vainshtein > wrote: > > Krzysztof, > Lots of thanks for your email. If I understand you

Re: [bess] A question regarding Single-Active ES redundancy mode and DF election in RFC 7432

Krzysztof, Lots of thanks for your email. If I understand you correctly, it actually replaces Single-Active Redundancy Mode with the Port-Active one as defined in the corresponding draft (it also uses the Preference-Based DF

Re: [bess] WG adoption poll for draft-malhotra-bess-evpn-unequal-lb-04

Support for WG adoption, as a co-author. Not aware of any IPR relevant to this document. Thanks. Jorge From: BESS on behalf of "stephane.litkow...@orange.com" Date: Tuesday, September 4, 2018 at 9:29 AM To: "bess@ietf.org" Subject: [bess] WG adoption poll for

Re: [bess] A question regarding Single-Active ES redundancy mode and DF election in RFC 7432

Hi Sasha, To use LAG in A/S mode on per VLAN basis, you can use ‘hack’, where you use preference-based DF election (draft-ietf-bess-evpn-pref-df) to ensure with the configuration that *all* VLANs on given ESI use PE1 as DF, and *all* VLANs on that ESI use PE2 as non-DF. Then, you need to have

Re: [bess] WG adoption poll for draft-malhotra-bess-evpn-unequal-lb-04

I support WG adoption. Thanks, Acee From: BESS on behalf of Stephane Litkowski Date: Tuesday, September 4, 2018 at 3:29 AM To: "bess@ietf.org" Subject: [bess] WG adoption poll for draft-malhotra-bess-evpn-unequal-lb-04 Hi WG, This email begins a two-week poll for BESS working group adoption

[bess] bess - New Meeting Session Request for IETF 103

A new meeting session request has just been submitted by Stephane Litkowski, a Chair of the bess working group. - Working Group Name: BGP Enabled ServiceS Area Name: Routing Area Session Requester: Stephane Litkowski Number of

Re: [bess] A question regarding Single-Active ES redundancy mode and DF election in RFC 7432

Ali, Lots of thanks for a prompt and detailed response. It matches my understanding of the situation with Single-Active Redundancy Mode of Ethernet Segments in EVPN. In particular, your confirmation that “You cannot use LAG to do active/standby on a per VLAN basis (aka EVPN single-active)” was

[bess] The BESS WG has placed draft-malhotra-bess-evpn-unequal-lb in state "Candidate for WG Adoption"

The BESS WG has placed draft-malhotra-bess-evpn-unequal-lb in state Candidate for WG Adoption (entered by Stephane Litkowski) The document is available at https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-malhotra-bess-evpn-unequal-lb/ ___ BESS mailing list