Re: [bess] Shepherd's Review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-pref-df

Hi Stephane, Please see in-line with [jorge2]. Thank you! Jorge From: slitkows.i...@gmail.com Date: Monday, August 31, 2020 at 11:49 AM To: Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View) , draft-ietf-bess-evpn-pref...@ietf.org , bess-cha...@ietf.org , bess@ietf.org Subject: RE: Shepherd's Review

Re: [bess] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-inter-subnet-forwarding-09: (with COMMENT)

Hi Eric, Thanks for your review and your comments, please refer to my replies inline marked with [AS]. On 7/14/20, 5:32 AM, "Éric Vyncke via Datatracker" wrote: Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-inter-subnet-forwarding-09: No Objection

[bess] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bess-evpn-per-mcast-flow-df-election-04.txt

A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the BGP Enabled ServiceS WG of the IETF. Title : Per multicast flow Designated Forwarder Election for EVPN Authors : Ali Sajassi

Re: [bess] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-na-flags-05

Thanks for considering my suggestions Jorge - your edits address all my concerns! RjS On 8/31/20 3:46 AM, Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View) wrote: Robert, Thank you very much for the review. Great points. Please see in-line with [Jorge]. All the changes will be included in the

Re: [bess] Intdir last call review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-na-flags-05

Thank you for reviewing, Ralf. We’ll leave the current normative language then. If anyone else has strong opinions about it, we can discuss it. Jorge From: BESS Date: Friday, August 28, 2020 at 6:29 PM To: int-...@ietf.org Cc: last-c...@ietf.org , bess@ietf.org ,

Re: [bess] Murray Kucherawy's Discuss on draft-ietf-bess-rfc5549revision-04: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Hi, I saw the change. However the text of that section still says "new" twice. Since the registration was made by RFC 5549, it isn't appropriate to call it "new". Any comments on the text I proposed in my DISCUSS? It's more typical of "bis" style work, in my experience. -MSK On Mon, Aug 31,

Re: [bess] Murray Kucherawy's Discuss on draft-ietf-bess-rfc5549revision-04: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Hi Murray, I have uploaded a new revision that clarifies the IANA section. -Original Message- From: Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker Sent: mercredi 26 août 2020 21:01 To: The IESG Cc: draft-ietf-bess-rfc5549revis...@ietf.org; bess-cha...@ietf.org; bess@ietf.org; Matthew Bocci

Re: [bess] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-na-flags-05

Robert, Thank you very much for the review. Great points. Please see in-line with [Jorge]. All the changes will be included in the next revision. Thank you! Jorge From: Robert Sparks via Datatracker Date: Tuesday, August 18, 2020 at 6:11 PM To: gen-...@ietf.org Cc:

[bess] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bess-rfc5549revision-05.txt

A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the BGP Enabled ServiceS WG of the IETF. Title : Advertising IPv4 Network Layer Reachability Information with an IPv6 Next Hop Authors : Stephane

Re: [bess] Erik Kline's No Objection on draft-ietf-bess-rfc5549revision-04: (with COMMENT)

Thanks, I have fixed all what was mentioned below for the next revision. Stephane -Original Message- From: Acee Lindem (acee) Sent: lundi 17 août 2020 13:46 To: Erik Kline ; The IESG Cc: matthew.bo...@nokia.com; bess-cha...@ietf.org; bess@ietf.org;