Why preclude RFC 6286 ?
Regards,
Jakob.
From: Idr On Behalf Of Muthu Arul Mozhi Perumal
Sent: Tuesday, February 2, 2021 9:21 PM
To: Gyan Mishra
Cc: TULASI RAM REDDY ; bess@ietf.org; i...@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Idr] [bess] Type 1 RD for Pure IPv6 network -- EVPN
Hi Gyan,
Please see inline..
Hi Gyan,
Please see inline..
Regards,
Muthu
On Sat, Jan 30, 2021 at 3:26 AM Gyan Mishra wrote:
> Muthu
>
> How does RFa. 6286 AS wide BGP identifier change the BGP path selection
> process when all attributes are equal and ‘bestpath compare-routerid” is
> uses so the valid/best path is
I support.
Regards,
Jakob.
From: BESS On Behalf Of slitkows.i...@gmail.com
Sent: Monday, January 18, 2021 12:58 AM
To: bess@ietf.org
Cc: bess-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: [bess] WG Last Call, IPR and Implementation Poll for
draft-ietf-bess-evpn-irb-extended-mobility-01
This email starts a
I Support for WG adoption.
Thanks
Krishna
From: BESS on behalf of "slitkows.i...@gmail.com"
Date: Monday, January 18, 2021 at 12:58 AM
To: "bess@ietf.org"
Cc: "bess-cha...@ietf.org"
Subject: [bess] WG Last Call, IPR and Implementation Poll for
draft-ietf-bess-evpn-irb-extended-mobility-01
I support this draft.
On Tue, Feb 2, 2021 at 2:46 AM wrote:
> Send BESS mailing list submissions to
> bess@ietf.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body
Support to publication of the draft. We also have an implementation of the
draft and would be happy to fill out any implementation survey.
Regards,
Keyur
From: BESS on behalf of "slitkows.i...@gmail.com"
Date: Monday, January 18, 2021 at 12:58 AM
To: "bess@ietf.org"
Cc:
Hi,
I support the draft as a co-author. I am not aware of any undisclosed IPR.
Thanks,
Aparna
On Feb 2, 2021, at 10:26 AM, Acee Lindem (acee)
mailto:acee=40cisco@dmarc.ietf.org>> wrote:
Hi Ali,
This should be updated automatically if the chairs update the “Replaced by”
meta data
Hi Ali,
This should be updated automatically if the chairs update the “Replaced by”
meta data for
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-malhotra-bess-evpn-irb-extended-mobility/
BTW, I support publication.
Thanks,
Acee
From: BESS on behalf of "Ali Sajassi (sajassi)"
Date: Tuesday,
Hi,
Thanks Anoop. Sure, will add the security consideration section.
Neeraj
On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 9:04 PM Anoop Ghanwani
wrote:
> The security considerations section is empty. Is it possible to have that
> updated before the WGLC?
>
> I will try to review and provide more detailed
I looked into the IPR, and it has been disclosed and it shows up for the
individual version of the draft but for some reason not for the WG version of
it!
From: BESS on behalf of "Ali Sajassi (sajassi)"
Date: Tuesday, February 2, 2021 at 9:39 AM
To: "slitkows.i...@gmail.com" ,
The IESG has approved the following document:
- 'Multicast VPN Fast Upstream Failover'
(draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-fast-failover-15.txt) as Proposed Standard
This document is the product of the BGP Enabled ServiceS Working Group.
The IESG contact persons are Alvaro Retana, Deborah Brungard and
The IESG has received a request from the BGP Enabled ServiceS WG (bess) to
consider the following document: - 'EVPN Operations, Administration and
Maintenance Requirements and
Framework'
as Informational RFC
The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final
Support.
Thanks,
--Satya
From: BESS on behalf of "slitkows.i...@gmail.com"
Date: Monday, January 18, 2021 at 12:58 AM
To: "bess@ietf.org"
Cc: "bess-cha...@ietf.org"
Subject: [bess] WG Last Call, IPR and Implementation Poll for
draft-ietf-bess-evpn-irb-extended-mobility-01
This email
Hi,
missed mentioning earlier that there are known implementations of this draft.
Thanks,
Neeraj
> On Feb 2, 2021, at 12:06 AM, Neeraj Malhotra wrote:
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> Support as co-author. Not aware of any undisclosed IPR.
>
> Thanks,
> Neeraj
>
>> On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 12:58 AM
Support
Thanks,
Jim Uttaro
From: BESS On Behalf Of LINGALA, AVINASH
Sent: Tuesday, February 02, 2021 4:20 AM
To: slitkows.i...@gmail.com; bess@ietf.org
Cc: bess-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [bess] WG Last Call, IPR and Implementation Poll for
Hi,
Support as co-author. Not aware of any undisclosed IPR.
Thanks,
Avinash
From: BESS on behalf of "slitkows.i...@gmail.com"
Date: Monday, January 18, 2021 at 3:58 AM
To: "bess@ietf.org"
Cc: "bess-cha...@ietf.org"
Subject: [bess] WG Last Call, IPR and Implementation Poll for
Hi Luc,
The default gateway aliasing concept is indeed covered in
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-bess-rfc7432bis-00#section-10.1
But there is no use of non-zero ESI along with this procedure.
If there is a use-case for it, compared to the existing functionality in the
draft above, we
Hi,
Support as co-author. Not aware of any undisclosed IPR.
Thanks,
Neeraj
On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 12:58 AM wrote:
> This email starts a two-week working group last call for
> draft-ietf-bess-evpn-irb-extended-mobility-01 [1]
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Please review the draft and send any comments to
18 matches
Mail list logo
