Re: [bess] AD Review of draft-ietf-bess-dci-evpn-overlay-05

2018-01-29 Thread Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View)
"bess-cha...@ietf.org" <bess-cha...@ietf.org>, "bess@ietf.org" <bess@ietf.org> Subject: Re: AD Review of draft-ietf-bess-dci-evpn-overlay-05 Jorge: Thanks for the update. I’m starting the IETF LC, but I need you to please fix the nits related to the references: =

Re: [bess] AD Review of draft-ietf-bess-dci-evpn-overlay-05

2018-01-26 Thread Alvaro Retana
gt;, "bess-cha...@ietf.org" < bess-cha...@ietf.org>, "Vigoureux, Martin (Nokia - FR/Paris-Saclay)" < martin.vigour...@nokia.com> *Subject: *AD Review of draft-ietf-bess-dci-evpn-overlay-05 *Resent-From: *<alias-boun...@ietf.org> *Resent-To: *<jorge.raba..

Re: [bess] AD Review of draft-ietf-bess-dci-evpn-overlay-05

2018-01-22 Thread Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View)
"draft-ietf-bess-dci-evpn-over...@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-bess-dci-evpn-over...@ietf.org> Cc: "bess@ietf.org" <bess@ietf.org>, "bess-cha...@ietf.org" <bess-cha...@ietf.org>, "Vigoureux, Martin (Nokia - FR/Paris-Saclay)" <martin.vigour...@n

[bess] AD Review of draft-ietf-bess-dci-evpn-overlay-05

2018-01-18 Thread Alvaro Retana
Dear authors: I just finished reading this document. As with draft-ietf-bess-evpn-overlay, it seems to me that this document is better suited as an Applicability Statement [1] instead of a Technical Specification -- both would result in a Standards Track document. It is hard for me to clearly