Re: [bess] Shepherd's Review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-pref-df

-evpn-pref...@ietf.org , bess-cha...@ietf.org , bess@ietf.org Subject: RE: [bess] Shepherd's Review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-pref-df Hi Jorge, Looks good to me. For D flag as mentioned, we have to explicitly state support/not support for all existing (RFCed or almost RFCed) DF types. Thanks

Re: [bess] Shepherd's Review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-pref-df

Andre Burdet (lburdet) ; Luc André Burdet ; slitkows.i...@gmail.com Cc: draft-ietf-bess-evpn-pref...@ietf.org; bess-cha...@ietf.org; bess@ietf.org Subject: Re: [bess] Shepherd's Review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-pref-df Hi Luc, Sounds good, we are in synch then. Stephane, hope you are good too

Re: [bess] Shepherd's Review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-pref-df

...@gmail.com Cc: draft-ietf-bess-evpn-pref...@ietf.org , bess-cha...@ietf.org , bess@ietf.org Subject: Re: [bess] Shepherd's Review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-pref-df Hi Jorge, Sorry for the imprecise language, this was indeed about Highest-Preference vs. Lowest-Preference algo. Seems we can agree

Re: [bess] Shepherd's Review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-pref-df

ot; , "bess-cha...@ietf.org" , "bess@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [bess] Shepherd's Review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-pref-df Hi Luc, Thanks for your email. A few comments: 1. You mention the lowest-ip vs highest-ip debate, but I don’t think there is any debate about the PE’s IP.

Re: [bess] Shepherd's Review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-pref-df

2021 at 2:42 PM To: Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View) , slitkows.i...@gmail.com Cc: draft-ietf-bess-evpn-pref...@ietf.org , bess-cha...@ietf.org , bess@ietf.org Subject: Re: [bess] Shepherd's Review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-pref-df Hi Jorge, Stéphane, Satya and I have gone over this

Re: [bess] Shepherd's Review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-pref-df

o:jorge.raba...@nokia.com>>, draft-ietf-bess-evpn-pref...@ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-bess-evpn-pref...@ietf.org> mailto:draft-ietf-bess-evpn-pref...@ietf.org>>, bess-cha...@ietf.org<mailto:bess-cha...@ietf.org> mailto:bess-cha...@ietf.org>>, bess@ietf.org<ma

Re: [bess] Shepherd's Review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-pref-df

-ietf-bess-evpn-pref...@ietf.org; bess-cha...@ietf.org; bess@ietf.org Subject: Re: [bess] Shepherd's Review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-pref-df Hi Stéphane, Jorge, On the issue of tie-breaking, I would agree with Stéphane. It is too easy for peering PEs to be misconfigured / in disagreement

Re: [bess] Shepherd's Review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-pref-df

*From:* Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View) > > *Sent:* vendredi 19 juin 2020 20:37 > *To:* slitkows.i...@gmail.com; draft-ietf-bess-evpn-pref...@ietf.org; > bess-cha...@ietf.org; bess@ietf.org > *Subject:* Re: Shepherd's Review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-pref-df > > > >

Re: [bess] Shepherd's Review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-pref-df

; bess@ietf.org Subject: Re: Shepherd's Review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-pref-df Hi Stephane, Thanks for the review and my apologies for the delay. We just posted a new revision. As usual, very good points. Please see in-line. Thx Jorge From: "slitkows.i...@gmail.com<mailto:slitkows.i...@g

Re: [bess] Shepherd's Review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-pref-df

" , 'BESS' Cc: "bess-cha...@ietf.org" Subject: Shepherd's Review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-pref-df Resent-From: Resent-To: , , , , , , Resent-Date: Wednesday, February 26, 2020 at 3:20 PM Hi Authors, Here is my review of the document: Please look at the nits and fix them. http

[bess] Shepherd's Review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-pref-df

Hi Authors, Here is my review of the document: Please look at the nits and fix them. https://www6.ietf.org/tools/idnits?url=https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft