@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Rtgdir early review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-unequal-lb-18
Hi Neeraj,
On Wed, Dec 6, 2023 at 2:19 AM Neeraj Malhotra (nmalhotr)
mailto:nmalh...@cisco.com>> wrote:
Hi Dhruv,
rev20 incorporates all of the additional points below.
Regarding,
“* In cases where alloc
es".
Thanks!
Dhruv
> Thanks,
>
> Neeraj
>
>
>
> *From: *Dhruv Dhody
> *Date: *Monday, December 4, 2023 at 11:36 PM
> *To: *Neeraj Malhotra (nmalhotr)
> *Cc: *rtg-...@ietf.org , bess@ietf.org ,
> draft-ietf-bess-evpn-unequal-lb@ietf.org <
> draft-
@ietf.org ,
draft-ietf-bess-evpn-unequal-lb@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Rtgdir early review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-unequal-lb-18
Thanks Neeraj! Thanks for taking my comments into consideration!
Looking at -19 some additional points!
- No reference should be added in the abstract
- Note to the IESG
Thanks Neeraj! Thanks for taking my comments into consideration!
Looking at -19 some additional points!
- No reference should be added in the abstract
- Note to the IESG in the abstract, can be moved to the shepherd report and
provided the assigned shepherd agrees with your justification.
-
Hi Dhruv,
Many thanks for a very detailed review and comments. I have just published
version 19 that significantly revises the document to incorporate all of your
comments as well as comments from Genart early review. Please see additional
clarifications inline below. Please do let me know in
Hi Dhruv,
Many thanks for the review. Will update the draft and respond by next week.
Thanks,
Neeraj
On Thu, Nov 16, 2023 at 3:01 AM Dhruv Dhody via Datatracker <
nore...@ietf.org> wrote:
> Reviewer: Dhruv Dhody
> Review result: Has Issues
>
> # RTGDIR review of
