Re: [bess] WG adoption and IPR poll for draft-rabadan-sajassi-bess-evpn-ipvpn-interworking-02

2019-02-18 Thread Ali Sajassi (sajassi)
Support as a co-author. I am not aware of any undisclosed IPR. Cheers, Ali From: "stephane.litkow...@orange.com" Date: Monday, February 18, 2019 at 7:53 AM To: "draft-rabadan-sajassi-bess-evpn-ipvpn-interwork...@ietf.org" , "bess@ietf.org" Cc: "bess-cha...@ietf.org" Subject: WG adoption

Re: [bess] WGLC, IPR and implementation poll for draft-ietf-bess-nsh-bgp-control-plane

2019-02-18 Thread stephane.litkowski
Hi, The WGLC has ended. A new revision of the draft is required based on the discussions. Authors, Please publish the new revision, so we can proceed to the next step. Brgds, From: Andrew G. Malis [mailto:agma...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, January 28, 2019 15:37 To: John E Drake Cc:

Re: [bess] new WGLC for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-inter-subnet-forwarding-05

2019-02-18 Thread stephane.litkowski
Hi WG, The document has been updated to fulfil the comments raised by the WG. The document is now ready to go to the next step. Brgds, From: Ali Sajassi (sajassi) [mailto:saja...@cisco.com] Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2019 03:25 To: LITKOWSKI Stephane OBS/OINIS; bess@ietf.org;

[bess] A question on using EVPN label and Alias label in load balancing

2019-02-18 Thread Jaikumar Somasundaram
Hi All, -- || PORT1 | DEVICE1 |PORT3 --| PE1|- | 1/5| 2.2.2.2 | 1/4 | | || | |

Re: [bess] A question on using EVPN label and Alias label in load balancing

2019-02-18 Thread Jaikumar Somasundaram
Thanks a lot Jide, for the reply. Please find my response below [Jai] Thanks & Regards Jaikumar S From: Jide Akintola Sent: Monday, February 18, 2019 5:00 PM To: bess@ietf.org; Jaikumar Somasundaram Subject: Re: [bess] A question on using EVPN label and Alias label in load balancing Hi

Re: [bess] A question on using EVPN label and Alias label in load balancing

2019-02-18 Thread Jide Akintola
Hi Jaikumar, As per the rfc, aliasing is define as the ability of a PE to signal that it has reachability to an EVPN instance on a given ES even when it has learned no MAC addresses from that EVI/ES. It is advertised with Ethernet A-D per EVI type 1 routes. Aliasing improves load-balancing by

Re: [bess] A question on using EVPN label and Alias label in load balancing

2019-02-18 Thread Jide Akintola
Hi Jaikumar, You need to make a distinction between Alias label and several other EVPN routes labels defined in the RFC7432. Kindly check that RFC for the route encoding and their different usage/function. As detailed in my previous email, alias label is a "hint" to the remote PE to load

Re: [bess] A question on using EVPN label and Alias label in load balancing

2019-02-18 Thread Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View)
It “sounds” to me that Jaikumar’s question might be related to comparing MPLS-based vs MAC-based forwarding models. RFC8388 may help, sections 6-8. My 2 cents. Thx Jorge From: BESS on behalf of Jide Akintola Date: Monday, February 18, 2019 at 1:23 PM To: "bess@ietf.org" , Jaikumar

Re: [bess] WG adoption and IPR poll for draft-rabadan-sajassi-bess-evpn-ipvpn-interworking-02

2019-02-18 Thread UTTARO, JAMES
As co-author Support. Not aware of any undisclosed IPR. Thanks, Jim Uttaro From: stephane.litkow...@orange.com Sent: Monday, February 18, 2019 10:53 AM To: draft-rabadan-sajassi-bess-evpn-ipvpn-interwork...@ietf.org; bess@ietf.org Cc: bess-cha...@ietf.org Subject: WG adoption

Re: [bess] WG adoption and IPR poll for draft-rabadan-sajassi-bess-evpn-ipvpn-interworking-02

2019-02-18 Thread Mankamana Mishra (mankamis)
Support the adoption. Thanks Mankamana From: "stephane.litkow...@orange.com" Date: Monday, February 18, 2019 at 7:53 AM To: "draft-rabadan-sajassi-bess-evpn-ipvpn-interwork...@ietf.org" , "bess@ietf.org" Cc: "bess-cha...@ietf.org" Subject: WG adoption and IPR poll for

[bess] WG adoption and IPR poll for draft-rabadan-sajassi-bess-evpn-ipvpn-interworking-02

2019-02-18 Thread stephane.litkowski
This email begins a two-week poll for adoption of draft-rabadan-sajassi-bess-evpn-ipvpn-interworking-02 [1] Please review the draft and post any comments to the BESS working group list. We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies to this Document, to ensure that IPR

Re: [bess] WG adoption and IPR poll for draft-rabadan-sajassi-bess-evpn-ipvpn-interworking-02

2019-02-18 Thread Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View)
As co-author, I support this document for adoption. Not aware of any relevant IPR. Thank you. Jorge From: "stephane.litkow...@orange.com" Date: Monday, February 18, 2019 at 4:53 PM To: "draft-rabadan-sajassi-bess-evpn-ipvpn-interwork...@ietf.org" , "bess@ietf.org" Cc: "bess-cha...@ietf.org"

Re: [bess] WG adoption and IPR poll for draft-rabadan-sajassi-bess-evpn-ipvpn-interworking-02

2019-02-18 Thread John E Drake
Support. I'm not aware of any IPR. Yours Irrespectively, John From: stephane.litkow...@orange.com Sent: Monday, February 18, 2019 10:53 AM To: draft-rabadan-sajassi-bess-evpn-ipvpn-interwork...@ietf.org; bess@ietf.org Cc: bess-cha...@ietf.org Subject: WG adoption and IPR poll for

Re: [bess] A question on using EVPN label and Alias label in load balancing

2019-02-18 Thread Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View)
Ok, let me elaborate. A remote PE sending known unicast traffic to any PE attached to the all-active Ethernet Segment (non-DF or DF, it’s irrelevant here!), has to use a label that identifies the Broadcast Domain at the egress PE for a MAC lookup (if MAC-based forwarding) or a label that

Re: [bess] WG adoption and IPR poll for draft-rabadan-sajassi-bess-evpn-ipvpn-interworking-02

2019-02-18 Thread Jeff Tantsura
Yes/support Cheers, Jeff On Feb 18, 2019, 7:53 AM -0800, stephane.litkow...@orange.com, wrote: > This email begins a two-week poll for adoption of > draft-rabadan-sajassi-bess-evpn-ipvpn-interworking-02 > [1] > > Please review the draft and post any comments to the BESS working group list. > >