Yes/support
>
>
> From: BESS
> Date: Wednesday, September 9, 2020 at 12:43 PM
> To: bess@ietf.org
> Cc: bess-cha...@ietf.org
> Subject: [bess] WG adoption and IPR poll for
> draft-nr-bess-evpn-mh-split-horizon-03
>
> Hello,
>
>
>
> This email begins a two-weeks WG adoption poll for
>
I support this draft as a co-author. I am not aware of any IPR related to this.
Thanks
Kiran
From: BESS On Behalf Of Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia -
US/Mountain View)
Sent: Wednesday, September 9, 2020 6:36 AM
To: Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB) ; bess@ietf.org
Cc: bess-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: Re:
Thanks for the reply, Jorge. Just a quick reply to that:
>> A number of abbreviations need to be expanded on first use, including EVPN,
>> PE,
>> ND, IRB, and CE.
>
> [Jorge] I added those to the terminology section. Thanks.
Ah, but the point was to make sure they're expanded in the
Hi MaliĊĦa,
Thank you for your review.
The effect of receiving the wrong O or R flags will mean the receiving host
will trigger the wrong RFC4861 procedures. I added this text, hopefully it is
sufficient:
For example, as specified in [RFC4861], the receiver of a NA message with
O not set
Hi Barry,
Thank you for the review.
Please see in-line with [Jorge].
Thx
Jorge
From: Barry Leiba via Datatracker
Date: Wednesday, September 9, 2020 at 5:35 AM
To: The IESG
Cc: draft-ietf-bess-evpn-na-fl...@ietf.org
, bess-cha...@ietf.org
, bess@ietf.org , Bocci, Matthew (Nokia -
GB) ,
