Hi Jeffrey
I am all set with the draft technical Q as this draft fills an important
gap for operators, I believe is in excellent shape ready for publication.
Thank you
Gyan
On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 11:08 AM Gyan Mishra wrote:
>
> Thanks Jeffrey for the explaining section 14 and your drafts
Hi Jeffrey, WG,
Thanks for the further discussions.
“Didn’t we have such “unified” encoding already – an MPLS label?”
I agree and I would prefer to impl & use MPLS label for service delimiting in
vxlan/nvgre/geneve environment if I have to implement the following 6 options:
Thanks Jeffrey for the explaining section 14 and your drafts use case that
is being addressed.
So Section 14 is a case of C-Multicast PIM ASM and non inter site
local-only shared C-Tree where the PE can function as MVPN C-RP, Anycast RP
or MSDP peer for the MVPN and the procedure describes the
Gyan- most of these interop questions for MSDP-MVPN are covered in
RFC6514. This doc makes no changes to those procedures. This doc simply
addresses a fundamental gap that was missed in RFC6514- specifically that
MSDP SAs contain 3 pieces of info (source, group, originating RP) and MVPN
SAs
Hi,
I corresponded with Amanda Baber and she says we can add a note to the IANA
Considerations section of the IRB draft stating that "This document has been
listed as an additional reference for the MAC/IP Advertisement route in the
EVPN Route Type registry".
Yours Irrespectively,
John
Hi,
I think that we want to keep the text as-is. I.e., withdraw the route and then
send an ARP probe, because in the normal case the ARP probe will fail and we
have cleaned up expeditiously. A positive response to the ARP probe is highly
unlikely, but if it happens then we need to
Hi Ben,
Sorry for the delayed response. I think we can address your last two comments
rather easily and hopefully close this review. Please refer to my replies
marked in red.
From: Benjamin Kaduk
Date: Saturday, February 27, 2021 at 4:06 PM
To: Ali Sajassi (sajassi)
Cc: The IESG ,
Thanks Leonard that answers my questions.
Kind Regards
Gyan
On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 2:40 PM Leonard Giuliano wrote:
>
> Gyan- most of these interop questions for MSDP-MVPN are covered in
> RFC6514. This doc makes no changes to those procedures. This doc simply
> addresses a fundamental gap
