Re: [bess] WGLC on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework

2018-03-27 Thread Gaurav Dawra
Support. Sent from my iPhone > On Mar 26, 2018, at 7:21 AM, > wrote: > > Hello working group, > > This email starts a two-week Working Group Last Call on > draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework-00 [1] > > This poll runs until *the 9th of April*. > > We are also polling for knowled

Re: [bess] WGLC on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework

2018-03-27 Thread Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View)
Hi Stephane, Please see in-line. Thanks. Jorge From: BESS on behalf of "stephane.litkow...@orange.com" Date: Tuesday, March 27, 2018 at 8:48 AM To: "bess@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [bess] WGLC on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework Hi Authors, Speaking as a WG member, I have two comments

[bess] Protocol Action: 'Extensions to BGP Signaled Pseudowires to support Flow-Aware Transport Labels' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-bess-fat-pw-bgp-04.txt)

2018-03-27 Thread The IESG
The IESG has approved the following document: - 'Extensions to BGP Signaled Pseudowires to support Flow-Aware Transport Labels' (draft-ietf-bess-fat-pw-bgp-04.txt) as Proposed Standard This document is the product of the BGP Enabled ServiceS Working Group. The IESG contact persons are Alvaro

[bess] Last Call: (IP Prefix Advertisement in EVPN) to Proposed Standard

2018-03-27 Thread The IESG
The IESG has received a request from the BGP Enabled ServiceS WG (bess) to consider the following document: - 'IP Prefix Advertisement in EVPN' as Proposed Standard The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final comments on this action. Please send substantive comm

Re: [bess] AD Review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-prefix-advertisement-09

2018-03-27 Thread Alvaro Retana
Thanks Jorge! I started the IETF LC. Alvaro. On February 27, 2018 at 4:41:35 PM, Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View) (jorge.raba...@nokia.com) wrote: Thank you so much for such a thorough review. You had very good points here (see in-line for my replies). I posted rev 10 addressing all

Re: [bess] WGLC on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework

2018-03-27 Thread Sathappan, Senthil (Nokia - US/Mountain View)
Support. Not aware of any relevant IPR related to this document. Thanks, Senthil. From: BESS mailto:bess-boun...@ietf.org>> on behalf of "stephane.litkow...@orange.com" mailto:stephane.litkow...@orange.com>> Date: Monday, March 26, 2018 at 3:21 PM To: "be

Re: [bess] draft-mohanty-bess-evpn-bum-opt-00 - clarification on problem description

2018-03-27 Thread UTTARO, JAMES
Mankamana, If not a requirements draft than a usage draft indicating what solutions are applicable for the different inter-connect solutions. I think this would be quite useful to architects/designers.. Thanks, Jim Uttaro From: Mankamana Mishra (mankamis) [mailt

Re: [bess] draft-mohanty-bess-evpn-bum-opt-00 - clarification on problem description

2018-03-27 Thread Mankamana Mishra (mankamis)
Hi Jim, About your pointing of writing down requirement draft for multicast. I had discussion with Ali in this IETF (After we discussed). But looks like it might be too late for now to write requirement, as there are many multicast related solution draft already in BESS working group. But still

Re: [bess] WGLC on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework

2018-03-27 Thread Dolganow, Andrew (Nokia - SG/Singapore)
+1 Andrew Sent from my iPhone On Mar 27, 2018, at 9:07 PM, UTTARO, JAMES mailto:ju1...@att.com>> wrote: Support.. Thanks, Jim Uttaro From: BESS [mailto:bess-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Jeff Tantsura Sent: Monday, March 26, 2018 6:26 PM To: stephane.litkow...@orange.com

Re: [bess] WGLC on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework

2018-03-27 Thread UTTARO, JAMES
Support.. Thanks, Jim Uttaro From: BESS [mailto:bess-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Jeff Tantsura Sent: Monday, March 26, 2018 6:26 PM To: stephane.litkow...@orange.com; bess@ietf.org Subject: Re: [bess] WGLC on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework Yes/support Cheers, Jeff

Re: [bess] WGLC on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework

2018-03-27 Thread stephane.litkowski
Hi Authors, Speaking as a WG member, I have two comments: - As I have pointed during the BESS meeting, it would be good to have a clear definition of what is a DF type vs a capability. - I think it would be good to have the draft telling that the implementation of HRW and AC-

Re: [bess] WGLC on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework

2018-03-27 Thread Van De Velde, Gunter (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)
Yes, support. This is meaningful work. G/ From: BESS [mailto:bess-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of stephane.litkow...@orange.com Sent: Monday, March 26, 2018 16:21 To: bess@ietf.org Subject: [bess] WGLC on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework Hello working group, This email starts a two