Dear Glenn,
Thank you for waiting the update.
I have submitted the updated version of
draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-mib.
Links to the draft and diff are as follows.
URL:
https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-mib-06.txt
Htmlized: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-bess-mvpn-m
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the BGP Enabled ServiceS WG of the IETF.
Title : BGP/MPLS Layer 3 VPN Multicast Management Information
Base
Authors : Zhaohui (Jeffrey) Zhang
On 4/30/2018 12:40 PM, Ali Sajassi (sajassi) wrote:
The DF type is an 8-bit type, so there can be a single valid value.
Sorry, for some reason I thought it was a set of flags. My mistake ;-(
___
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/m
Eric,
Thank you for the comments.
Please see in-line.
-Original Message-
From: Eric C Rosen
Date: Monday, April 30, 2018 at 7:46 AM
To: "Satya Mohanty (satyamoh)" ,
"stephane.litkow...@orange.com" ,
"bess@ietf.org" ,
"draft-ietf-bess-evpn-df-election-framework.auth...@ietf.org"
Su
Hi Eric,
On 4/30/18, 7:46 AM, "Eric C Rosen" wrote:
Let me add a couple of minor comments:
- The draft should state the action to be taken when receiving a route
that has more than one DF Election Extended Community. I think the two
possible options are "treat the route
Let me add a couple of minor comments:
- The draft should state the action to be taken when receiving a route
that has more than one DF Election Extended Community. I think the two
possible options are "treat the route as if it did not have any DF
Election Extended Community", and "treat-as-w
