On Sat, Jan 19, 2019 at 12:38:02AM +, Satya Mohanty (satyamoh) wrote:
> Hi Benjamin,
>
>
>
> Thanks for your comments. My replies inline [Satya]
>
>
>
> On 1/18/19, 8:01 AM, "Benjamin Kaduk" wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 10:10:16PM +, Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia -
>
Dave, Ali,
When a PE-A has multiple IPsec tunnels with another PE (PE-B), some are per WAN
port, some are per subnet or per tenant, are the policy-list & DH-group-list
specific to one IPsec tunnel or to all the IPsec tunnels terminated at the
PE-A? For example PE-A has PE based IPsec tunnel
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the BGP Enabled ServiceS WG of the IETF.
Title : EVPN Virtual Ethernet Segment
Authors : Ali Sajassi
Patrice Brissette
Ali, et al,
One of the requirement you stated in the document is (under the section 2.3)
"1) Per pair of PEs: A single IPsec tunnel between a pair of PEs to be used
for all tenants' traffic supported by the pair of PEs."
Assuming that the solution is intended for SD-WAN. The SD-WAN
On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 10:10:16PM +, Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain
View) wrote:
> Benjamin,
>
> Thank you very much for your review.
> Satya and I have looked at your points one by one, please see in-line. Let us
> know if you are ok now. We'll publish revision 08 soon.
I see that
FYI
We just posted revision 08 which addresses all the comments given during the
review (thank you all for that). From the authors perspective, the document is
ready to go.
Thanks.
Jorge
-Original Message-
From: "Rabadan, Jorge (Nokia - US/Mountain View)"
Date: Thursday, January
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the BGP Enabled ServiceS WG of the IETF.
Title : Framework for EVPN Designated Forwarder Election
Extensibility
Authors : Jorge Rabadan
